Skip to main content
Log in

The contribution of hip fracture to risk of subsequent fractures: data from two longitudinal studies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The contribution of hip fracture to the risk of subsequent fractures is unclear. Methods: Data from the Baltimore Hip Studies and the Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly (EPESE) were used. Baltimore subjects enrolled at the time of hip fracture (n=549) and EPESE subjects without previous fractures at baseline (n=10,680) were followed for 2–10 years. Self-reported nonhip skeletal fracture was the outcome, and hip fracture was a time-varying covariate in a survival analysis stratified by study site. The model was adjusted for race, sex, age, BMI, stroke, cancer, difficulty walking across a room, dependence in grooming, dependence in transferring, and cognitive impairment. Results: The rate of all subsequent self-reported fractures after hip fracture was 10.4 fractures/100 person-years. The unadjusted hazard of nonhip skeletal fracture was 2.52 (95% confidence interval 2.05 to 3.12) for subjects with hip fracture compared with subjects without; when adjusted for other known fracture risk factors the hazard ratio was 1.62 (1.30 to 2.02). Men and women had a similar relative risk increase. The increased risk of secondary fracture after hip fracture persisted over time. Conclusions: A hip fracture is associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk of subsequent fracture, which is not entirely explained by prefracture risk factors. Careful attention to secondary prevention is warranted in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torgerson D, Dolan P (1998) Prescribing by general practitioners after an osteoporotic fracture. Ann Rheum Dis 57:378–379

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Colon-Emeric C, Yballe L, Sloane R et al (2000) Expert physician recommendations and current practice patterns for evaluating and treating men with osteoporotic hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:1261–1263

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Klotzbuecher C, Ross P, Landsman P et al (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ismail A, Cockerill W, Cooper C et al (2001) Prevalent vertebral deformity predicts incident hip though not distal forearm fracture: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 12:85–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Melton LJ 3rd, Atkinson EJ, Cooper C et al (1999) Vertebral fractures predict subsequent fractures. Osteoporos Int 10:214–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cuddihy M, Gabriel S, Crowson C et al (1999) Forearm fractures as predictors of subsequent osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 9:469–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Magaziner J, Simonsick E, Kashner M et al (1990) Predictors of functional recovery one year following hospital discharge for hip fracture: a prospective study. J Gerontol 45:M101–M107

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kane RL, Chen Q, Finch M et al (1998) Functional outcomes of posthospital care for stroke and hip fracture patients under medicare. J Am Geriatr Soc 46:1525–1533

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gunnes M, Mellstrom D, Johnell O (1998) How well can a previous fracture indicate a new fracture? Acta Orthop Scand 69:508–512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Melton LJ 3rd, Ilstrup D, Beckenbaugh R et al (1982) Hip fracture recurrence: a population-based study. Clin Orthop 167:131–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van Staa TP, Leufkens HGM, Cooper C (2002) Does a fracture at one site predict later fractures at other sites? a British cohort study. Osteoporos Int 13:624–629

    Google Scholar 

  12. Colon-Emeric C, Sloane R, Hawkes W et al (2000) The risk of subsequent skeletal fractures in community dwelling men and male veterans with hip fracture. Am J Med 109:324–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cornoni-Huntley J, Blazer DG, Lafferty ME et al (1990) Established populations for epidemiologic studies of the elderly, vol 2. National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD

  14. Magaziner J, Hawkes W, Hebel JR, Zimmerman SI et al (2000) Recovery from hip fracture is eight areas of function. J Gerontol 55A(9):M448–M507

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fredman L, Hawkes W, Zimmerman SI et al (2001) Extending gerontological research through linking investigators’ studies to public-use datasets. Gerontologist 41(1):15–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weatherall M (2000) A meta-analysis of 25 hydroxyvitamin D in older people with fracture of the proximal femur. N Z Med J 113:137–140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bruce DG, St John A, Nicklason F et al (1999) Secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients from Western Australia with hip fracture: relationship to type of hip fracture, renal function, and vitamin D deficiency. J Am Geriatr Soc 47:354–359

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fox KM, Magaziner J, Hawkes WG et al (2000) Loss of bone density and lean body mass after hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 11:31–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fox KM, Hawkes WG, Hebel JR et al (1998) Mobility after hip fracture predicts health outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 46:169–173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marcantonio ER, Flacker JM, Michaels M (2000) Delirium is independently associated with poor functional recovery after hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:618–624

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Randell A, Nguyen T, Bhalerao N et al (2000) Deterioration in quality of life following hip fracture: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 11:460–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ismail AA, O’Neill TW, Cockerill W et al (2000) Validity of self-report of fractures: results from a prospective study in men and women across Europe. Osteoporos Int 11(3):248–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Hartford/AFAR Academic Geriatric Fellowship Program, the Institute for Medical Research at the Durham VA Medical Center, The Claude A. Pepper Older American’s Independence Center AG-11268, and a Brookdale National Geriatrics Fellowship. Participants were selected from the Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly, which was performed pursuant to NIA Contract Number N01-AG-1-2102, and the Baltimore Hip Studies funded by NIA R37 A609901.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cathleen Colón-Emeric.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colón-Emeric, C., Kuchibhatla, M., Pieper, C. et al. The contribution of hip fracture to risk of subsequent fractures: data from two longitudinal studies. Osteoporos Int 14, 879–883 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1460-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1460-x

Keywords

Navigation