Abstract
Objective
To investigate the effect of a backboard, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provider body position and bed height on the quality of chest compression during simulated in-hospital resuscitation.
Design and setting
Randomised controlled cross-over trial in a university hospital.
Participants
Second-year medical student basic life support instructors.
Interventions
Chest compressions performed on a resuscitation manikin placed on a hospital bed with/without a CPR backboard, kneeling on the bed adjacent to the manikin and lowering the height of the bed.
Measurements and results
Sub-optimal chest compressions were performed on all surfaces. There were no differences in compression depth: standard CPR, 29 ± 7 mm; backboard CPR, 31 ± 10 mm; kneeling on the bed, 30 ± 7 mm; lowering bed height, 32 ± 10 mm. Compression rate and duty cycle were similar on each surface. Participants failed to recognise their poor quality CPR, and there was no difference in assessment of fatigue or efficacy of CPR between surfaces.
Conclusions
In contrast to current guidelines, the use of a CPR backboard did not improve chest compressions. Furthermore, kneeling on the bed adjacent to the victim or lowering bed height did not impact materially on the quality of chest compression. These findings should be validated in clinical studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bur A, Kittler H, Sterz F, Holzer M, Eisenburger P, Oschatz E, Kofler J, Laggner AN (2001) Effects of bystander first aid, defibrillation and advanced life support on neurologic outcome and hospital costs in patients after ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Intensive Care Med 27:1474–1480
Gallagher EJ, Lombardi G, Gennis P (1995) Effectiveness of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 274:1922–1925
Abella BS, Alvarado JP, Myklebust H, Edelson DP, Barry A, O'Hearn N, Vanden Hoek TL, Becker LB (2005) Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 293:305–310
Abella BS, Sandbo N, Vassilatos P, Alvarado JP, O'Hearn N, Wigder HN, Hoffman P, Tynus K, Vanden Hoek TL, Becker LB (2005) Chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal: a prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 111:428–434
International Liaison Committee for Resuscitation (2005) Adult basic life support. II. Resuscitation 67:187–201
Yu T, Weil MH, Tang W, Sun S, Klouche K, Povoas H, Bisera J (2002) Adverse outcomes of interrupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation. Circulation 106:368–372
Sato Y, Weil MH, Sun S, Tang W, Xie J, Noc M, Bisera J (1997) Adverse effects of interrupting precordial compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med 25:733–736
Allen M, Augre C, Rogers H, Perkins GD (2004) Does bed height effect the efficacy of chest compressions? Resuscitation 62:323
Smith CM, Stephenson BTF, Gao F, Perkins GD (2004) The effect of a back board on CPR performance. Resuscitation 62:337
Perkins GD, Hulme J, Bion JF (2002) Peer-led resuscitation training for healthcare students: a randomised controlled study. Intensive Care Med 28:698–700
Perkins GD, Augre C, Rogers H, Allan M, Thickett DR (2005) CPREzy: an evaluation during simulated cardiac arrest on a hospital bed. Resuscitation 64:103–108
Handley AJ, Koster R, Monsieurs K, Perkins GD, Davies S, Bossaert L (2005) European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation 67 [Suppl 1]:S7–S23
Bellamy RF, DeGuzman LR, Pedersen DC (1984) Coronary blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in swine. Circulation 69:174–180
Ornato JP, Levine RL, Young DS, Racht EM, Garnett AR, Gonzalez ER (1989) The effect of applied chest compression force on systemic arterial pressure and end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration during CPR in human beings. Ann Emerg Med 18:732–737
Tweed M, Tweed C, Perkins GD (2001) The effect of differing support surfaces on the efficacy of chest compressions using a resuscitation manikin model. Resuscitation 51:179–183
Boe JM, Babbs CF (1999) Mechanics of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed with the patient on a soft bed vs a hard surface. Acad Emerg Med 6:754–757
Perkins GD, Benny R, Giles S, Gao F, Tweed MJ (2003) Do different mattresses affect the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Intensive Care Med 29:2330–2335
Hightower D, Thomas SH, Stone CK, Dunn K, March JA (1995) Decay in quality of closed-chest compressions over time. Ann Emerg Med 26:300–303
Steen S, Liao Q, Pierre L, Paskevicius A, Sjoberg T (2002) Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation 55:285–299
Castillo C, Young C, Bisera J, Weil MH (2004) Miniaturized chest compressor. Crit Care Med 32:S366–S368
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant from the Resuscitation Council (UK).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perkins, G.D., Smith, C.M., Augre, C. et al. Effects of a backboard, bed height, and operator position on compression depth during simulated resuscitation. Intensive Care Med 32, 1632–1635 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0273-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0273-8