Skip to main content
Log in

Angehörige auf der Intensivstation

(Un)Befriedigte Bedürfnisse

Relatives in intensive care units

(Un)Satisfied needs

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Nervenarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Angehörige von Patienten auf Intensivstationen haben wichtige Unterstützungsbedürfnisse, die bislang häufig unbefriedigt bleiben.

Fragestellung

Beschreibung der Belastungen und Bedürfnisse, Bedürfniserfassung, empirische Evidenz für diese Bedürfnisse, Güte der Bedürfnisbefriedigung; Unterstützungsangebote und Wirksamkeit kommunikativer Empfehlungen für diese besondere Situation.

Material und Methoden

Auswertung von Literaturübersichten, Diskussion von qualitativen und quantitativen Grundlagenarbeiten, Metaanalysen und Expertenempfehlungen.

Ergebnisse

Angehörige von Patienten auf Intensivstationen benennen kognitive, emotionale, soziale und praktische Unterstützungsbedürfnisse. Wichtige Bedürfnisse, wie die Aufrechterhaltung von Hoffnung und Sicherheit sowie eine aufrichtige, bedarfsgerechte Kommunikation, werden bislang unzureichend wahrgenommen und selten angemessen befriedigt. Die Gewichtung und Priorisierung von Bedürfnissen wird durch soziodemographische und kulturelle Faktoren beeinflusst. Psychoedukative Interventionen verbessern das psychische Befinden der Angehörigen. Kommunikative Strategien für die Behandler verringern bei den Angehörigen das Risiko einer posttraumatischen Belastungsstörung, reduzieren Ängstlichkeit und Depressivität und verbessern die partizipative Entscheidungsfindung.

Schlussfolgerungen

Behandler sollen für die Spezifika dieser besonderen Situation sensibilisiert und kommunikativ geschult werden. Für die Behandler ist Selbsterfahrung hinsichtlich der eigenen psychischen Abwehrprozesse ebenso wichtig wie die Verfeinerung der kommunikativen Kompetenz zur Erschließung und angemessenen Berücksichtigung der subjektiven Erlebenswelt der Angehörigen. Auf bestehende Unterstützungsangebote sollte hingewiesen und zur Inanspruchnahme ermutigt werden.

Abstract

Background

Relatives of patients in intensive care units (ICU) have important supportive care needs which are often unrecognized and rarely satisfactorily met.

Objectives

Description of stress factors and strains as well as supportive care needs, assessment of care needs, empirical evidence for care needs, satisfaction of care needs, options and efficacy of psychosocial support and communication recommendations for this special situation.

Material and methods

Evaluation of literature review articles, discussion of basic qualitative and quantitative research findings, meta-analyses and expert recommendations.

Results

Relatives of ICU patients report a number of cognitive, emotional, social and pragmatic support needs. Important needs, such as maintenance of hope and security as well as sincere and needs-adjusted communication often remain unrecognized and are rarely satisfactorily met. The weighting and prioritization of support needs are modulated by sociodemographic and cultural factors. Psychoeducative interventions reduce the psychosocial distress of family members. Communicative strategies of healthcare professionals reduce the risk of posttraumatic stress disorders for family members, reduce anxiety and depression and improve participative decision making.

Conclusion

Healthcare professionals in ICUs should be sensitized to the specific characteristics of these special situations. For healthcare professionals it is equally important to improve self-awareness regarding their own defense mechanisms and to refine communicative competence on accessibility and adequately address the reality of subjective experiences of family members. Psychosocial support services should be recommended and utilization should be encouraged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Agren S, Berg S, Svedjeholm R et al (2015) Psychoeducational support to post cardiac surgery heart failure patients and their partners–a randomised pilot study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 31:10–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Agren S, Evangelista LS, Hjelm C et al (2012) Dyads affected by chronic heart failure: a randomized study evaluating effects of education and psychosocial support to patients with heart failure and their partners. J Card Fail 18:359–366

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S et al (2002) Impact of a family information leaflet on effectiveness of information provided to family members of intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:438–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N et al (2005) Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171:987–994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R et al (2000) SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist 5:302–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bijttebier P, Vanoost S, Delva D et al (2001) Needs of relatives of critical care patients: perceptions of relatives, physicians and nurses. Intensive Care Med 27:160–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chien WT, Chiu YL, Lam LW et al (2006) Effects of a needs-based education programme for family carers with a relative in an intensive care unit: a quasi-experimental study. Int J Nurs Stud 43:39–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Covinsky KE, Goldman L, Cook EF et al (1994) The impact of serious illness on patients’ families. SUPPORT investigators. study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment. JAMA 272:1839–1844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Daley L (1984) The perceived immediate needs of families with relatives in the intensive care setting. Heart Lung 13:231–237

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Davidson JE, Powers K, Hedayat KM et al (2007) Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: american college of critical care medicine task force 2004–2005. Crit Care Med 35:605–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Freichels TA (1991) Needs of family members of patients in the intensive care unit over time. Crit Care Nurs Q 14:16–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hampe SO (1975) Needs of the grieving spouse in a hospital setting. Nurs Res 24:113–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansen E, Bejenke C (2010) Negative and positive suggestions in anaesthesia : Improved communication with anxious surgical patients. Anaesthesist 59:199–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jacono J, Hicks G, Antonioni C et al (1990) Comparison of perceived needs of family members between registered nurses and family members of critically ill patients in intensive care and neonatal intensive care units. Heart Lung 19:72–78

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones C, Skirrow P, Griffiths RD et al (2004) Post-traumatic stress disorder-related symptoms in relatives of patients following intensive care. Intensive Care Med 30:456–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lam P, Beaulieu M (2004) Experiences of families in the neurological ICU: a „bedside phenomenon“. J Neurosci Nurs 36:142–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Langewitz W (2010) Patientenzentrierte Gesprächsführung. In: Adler RH, Herzog W, Joraschky P, Köhle K, Langewitz W, Söllner W, Wesiack W (Hrsg) Uexküll. Psychosomatische Medizin: Theoretische Modelle und klinische Praxis. Urban & Fischer, München, S 338–347

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B et al (2007) A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med 356:469–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leske JS (1986) Needs of relatives of critically ill patients: a follow-up. Heart Lung 15:189–193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martire LM, Lustig AP, Schulz R et al (2004) Is it beneficial to involve a family member? A meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for chronic illness. Health Psychol 23:599–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mendonca D, Warren NA (1998) Perceived and unmet needs of critical care family members. Crit Care Nurs Q 21:58–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Molter NC (1979) Needs of relatives of critically ill patients: a descriptive study. Heart Lung 8:332–339

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Padilla CF (2014) Most important needs of family members of critical patients in light of the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory. Invest Educ Enferm 32:306–316

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pochard F, Darmon M, Fassier T et al (2005) Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients before discharge or death: a prospective multicenter study. J Crit Care 20:90–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Popek V, Hönig K (2015) Cancer and family: tasks and stress of relatives. Nervenarzt 86:266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Revenstorf D, Peter B (2015) Hypnose in Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Medizin: Manual für die Praxis. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Titler MG, Cohen MZ, Craft MJ (1991) Impact of adult critical care hospitalization: perceptions of patients, spouses, children, and nurses. Heart Lung 20:174–182

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Horn E, Tesh A (2000) The effect of critical care hospitalization on family members: stress and responses. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 19:40–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Verhaeghe S, Defloor T, Van Zuuren F et al (2005) The needs and experiences of family members of adult patients in an intensive care unit: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs 14:501–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Hönig.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

K. Hönig und H. Gündel geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hönig, K., Gündel, H. Angehörige auf der Intensivstation. Nervenarzt 87, 269–275 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-016-0069-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-016-0069-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation