Skip to main content
Log in

Dysphagiediagnostik und -therapie des akuten Schlaganfalls

Eine bundesweite Erhebung auf zertifizierten Stroke-Units

Dysphagia diagnostics and therapy of acute stroke

Federal survey of certified stroke units

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Nervenarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die Dysphagie als Schlaganfallsymptom ist infolge von Mangelernährung und Aspirationspneumonie mit einer erhöhten Morbidität und Mortalität assoziiert. Die rechtzeitige Identifikation und gezielte Behandlung von Risikopatienten verbessert das Outcome.

Methoden

Durch schriftliche Befragung wurde der gegenwärtige Stand der Dysphagiediagnostik und -therapie auf zertifizierten deutschen Stroke-Units erhoben.

Ergebnisse

Von 163 angeschriebenen Kliniken nahmen 51% an der Umfrage teil. Davon haben 94% ein standardisiertes Dysphagiekonzept etabliert, dessen Durchführung mehrheitlich (64%) den Logopäden obliegt. Hauptelemente sind pflegerische Schluckassessments (72%) und die klinisch-logopädische Schluckuntersuchung (93%). Über apparative Diagnostik verfügen 55%, wobei die Videoendoskopie (52%) weiter verbreitet ist als die Videofluoroskopie (17%). Die Therapie in der Akutphase erfolgt überwiegend durch Kostanpassung.

Schlussfolgerung

Insgesamt sind Strukturen zur Dysphagiediagnostik und -therapie vorhanden, die individuellen Strategien jedoch heterogen und Unterschiede in der Versorgungsqualität deutlich erkennbar.

Summary

Background

Due to malnutrition and aspiration pneumonia dysphagia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in acute stroke patients. Early detection of patients at risk of dysphagia leading to timely treatment improves the outcome.

Methods

A survey concerning the current state of dysphagia diagnostics and therapy was carried out among certified stoke units in Germany.

Results

Of the 163 invited hospitals 51% participated in the study. A standardized dysphagia program lying mainly within the responsibility of speech language therapists (64%) is established in 94%. Main elements are swallowing assessments carried out by nurses (72%) and the clinical swallowing examination (93%). Instrumental diagnostics are available in 55% with videoendoscopy (52%) being more widely used than videofluoroscopy (17%). In the acute stage nutrition with texture modified diets is the primary therapeutic strategy.

Conclusions

Structured programs for the diagnosis and treatment of dysphagia have generally been established but individual strategies differ and differences in the quality of care are obvious.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. American Speech Language Hearing Association (ASHA) (2003) National Outcomes Measurement System (NOMS): adult speech-language pathology user’s guide. http://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/members/research/NOMS/AdultNOMSFCMs.pdf

  2. Bartolome G (2006) Bogenhausener Dysphagiescore. In: Bartolome G, Schröter-Morasch H (Hrsg) Schluckstörungen – Diagnostik und Rehabilitation, 4. Aufl. Urban und Fischer, München, S 360 f

  3. Bours GJ, Speyer R, Lemmens J et al (2009) Bedside screening tests vs. videofluoroscopy or fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing to detect dysphagia in patients with neurological disorders: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 65:477–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carnaby G, Hankey GJ, Pizzi J (2006) Behavioural intervention for dysphagia in acute stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 5:31–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carnaby-Mann G, Lenius K (2008) The bedside examination in dysphagia. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 19:747–768, viii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Colodny N (2002) Interjudge and intrajudge reliabilities in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (fees) using the penetration-aspiration scale: a replication study. Dysphagia 17:308–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davalos A, Ricart W, Gonzalez-Huix F et al (1996) Effect of malnutrition after acute stroke on clinical outcome. Stroke 27:1028–1032

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dziewas R, Warnecke T, Olenberg S et al (2008) Towards a basic endoscopic assessment of swallowing in acute stroke – development and evaluation of a simple dysphagia score. Cerebrovasc Dis 26:41–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elmstahl S, Bulow M, Ekberg O et al (1999) Treatment of dysphagia improves nutritional conditions in stroke patients. Dysphagia 14:61–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Evans A, Perez I, Harraf F et al (2001) Can differences in management processes explain different outcomes between stroke unit and stroke-team care? Lancet 358:1586–1592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Falsetti P, Acciai C, Palilla R et al (2009) Oropharyngeal dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and clinical predictors in patients admitted to a neurorehabilitation unit. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 18:329–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Flowers HL, Skoretz SA, Streiner DL et al (2011) MRI-based neuroanatomical predictors of dysphagia after acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cerebrovasc Dis 32:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hinchey JA, Shephard T, Furie K et al (2005) Formal dysphagia screening protocols prevent pneumonia. Stroke 36:1972–1976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ickenstein GW, Stein J, Ambrosi D et al (2005) Predictors of survival after severe dysphagic stroke. J Neurol 252:1510–1516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelly AM, Leslie P, Beale T et al (2006) Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal residue severity? Clin Otolaryngol 31:425–432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kelly AM, Drinnan MJ, Leslie P (2007) Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? Laryngoscope 117:1723–1727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lakshminarayan K, Tsai AW, Tong X et al (2010) Utility of dysphagia screening results in predicting poststroke pneumonia. Stroke 41:2849–2854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Linfante I, Llinas RH, Schlaug G et al (2001) Diffusion-weighted imaging and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in the acute phase of posterior-circulation stroke. Arch Neurol 58:621–628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S et al (2005) Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke 36:2756–2763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McCullough GH, Rosenbek JC, Wertz RT et al (2005) Utility of clinical swallowing examination measures for detecting aspiration post-stroke. J Speech Lang Hear Res 48:1280–1293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Prosiegel M, Heintze M, Wagner-Sonntag E et al (2002) Deglutition disorders in neurological patients. A prospective study of diagnosis, pattern of impairment, therapy and outcome. Nervenarzt 73:364–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Prosiegel M (2008) Neurogene Dysphagien. In: Diener HC, Putzki N (Hrsg) Leitlinien für die Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie, 4. Aufl. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 908–919

  23. Ramsey DJ, Smithard DG, Kalra L (2003) Early assessments of dysphagia and aspiration risk in acute stroke patients. Stroke 34:1252–1257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramsey DJ, Smithard DG, Kalra L (2006) Can pulse oximetry or a bedside swallowing assessment be used to detect aspiration after stroke? Stroke 37:2984–2988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB et al (1996) A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia 11:93–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Smithard DG, Smeeton NC, Wolfe CD (2007) Long-term outcome after stroke: does dysphagia matter? Age Ageing 36:90–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Speyer R, Baijens L, Heijnen M, Zwijnenberg I (2010) Effects of therapy in oropharyngeal dysphagia by speech and language therapists: a systematic review. Dysphagia 25:40–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Suntrup S, Warnecke T, Kemmling A et al (2012) Dysphagia in patients with acute striatocapsular hemorrhage. J Neurol 259:93–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Warnecke T, Teismann I, Oelenberg S et al (2009) Towards a basic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in acute stroke – identification of salient findings by the inexperienced examiner. BMC Med Educ 9:13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Warnecke T, Teismann I, Oelenberg S et al (2009) The safety of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in acute stroke patients. Stroke 40:482–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Danksagung

Wir danken den Leitern und Mitarbeitern aller neurologischen Abteilungen, die an dieser Umfrage teilgenommen haben.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G.W. Ickenstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suntrup, S., Meisel, A., Dziewas, R. et al. Dysphagiediagnostik und -therapie des akuten Schlaganfalls. Nervenarzt 83, 1619–1624 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-012-3611-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-012-3611-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation