Skip to main content
Log in

Beckenringfrakturen im Alter

Die unterschätzte osteoporotische Fraktur

Pelvic ring fractures in the elderly

Underestimated osteoporotic fracture

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Unfallchirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Obwohl Beckenringfrakturen im Vergleich zum Gesamtkollektiv aller Frakturen mit 0,3–8,0% eher selten sind, steigt die Zahl von Beckenfrakturen bei älteren Patienten. Entsprechend des höheren Alters unterscheiden sich Unfallmechanismus, Frakturmorphologie, Therapie und Nachbehandlung. Frakturen im Alter werden vorwiegend durch Niedrigenergietraumen verursacht. Dieses erschwert die Diagnosefindung und führt insbesondere bei Insuffizienzfrakturen des Sakrums zu einem langen Leidensweg bis die richtigen therapeutischen Schritte eingeleitet werden. Bei der Therapie von Beckenringfrakturen im Alter muss ursächlich zwischen Hochenergietraumen, die im zunehmenden Alter abnehmen und Niedrigenergietraumen, die entsprechend zunehmen, unterschieden werden. Der schwerverletzte ältere Patient mit Beckenfraktur unterliegt einem höheren Risiko, einen hämorrhagischen Schock zu erleiden, gleichzeitig ist bei komplexen Frakturmustern und Osteoporose die Indikation zur Beckenzwinge kritisch zu stellen. Frakturen, die durch Niedrigenergietraumen entstehen führen, erscheinen häufig als isolierte Verletzungen des vorderen Beckenrings. Inwieweit eine Fraktur des hinteren Beckenrings übersehen wird ist fraglich. Die Frakturen können z. T. konservativ behandelt werden. Entscheidend für eine konservative Behandlung ist der Ausschluss einer Verletzung des hinteren Beckenrings, die meist durch eine Computertomographie erfolgt. Wenn eine osteoporotische Fraktur des Sakrums vorliegt, kann diese entweder durch konservative Maßnahmen oder Verschraubung aber auch mittels zusätzlichen Augmentationsverfahren wie Sakroplastie oder Sakroplastie mit zusätzlicher iliosakraler Verschraubung versorgt werden. Gerade bei Älteren empfiehlt sich eine perkutane, dreidimensional navigierte, iliosakrale Verschraubung, um eine suffiziente Schmerzreduktion und frühe Mobilisation zu gewährleisten.

Abstract

The incidence of pelvic fractures at 0.3–8% is low compared to all fractures. Nevertheless, the number of pelvic fractures in the elderly is increasing. Due to the increased age of the patient differences in trauma mechanism, fracture pattern and therapy occur. Most pelvic fractures in the elderly are caused by low-energy trauma. This makes it difficult to find the right diagnosis especially in insufficiency fracture of the pelvis. The time until the right treatment is started is prolonged significantly. Elderly patients who suffer from a high-energy fracture have a significantly higher risk of haemorrhage. At the same time emergency stabilisation of the pelvis using a C-clamp is dangerous due to the special fracture morphology with transiliac instabilities and the combination with osteoporosis. Low-energy trauma leads to simple fractures of the pubis, which often can be treated without operation. In these cases fractures of the dorsal pelvic ring need to be excluded using CT scan. Fracture of the dorsal part of the pelvic ring such as insufficiency fractures of the sacrum should be stabilized by 3D-guided percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation to reduce pain and allow early mobilisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Tosounidis G, Holstein JH, Culemann U et al (2010) Changes in epidemiology and treatment of pelvic ring fractures in Germany: an analysis on data of German Pelvic Multicenter Study Groups I and III (DGU/AO). Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 77:450–456

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morris RO, Sonibare A, Green DJ, Masud T (2000) Closed pelvic fractures: characteristics and outcomes in older patients admitted to medical and geriatric wards. Postgrad Med J 76:646–650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alost T, Waldrop RD (1997) Profile of geriatric pelvic fractures presenting to the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 15:576–578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT, Ballmer FA (1995) Rational approach to pelvic trauma. Resuscitation and early definitive stabilization. Clin Orthop Relat Res 318:61–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pehle B, Nast-Kolb D, Oberbeck R et al (2003) Significance of physical examination and radiography of the pelvis during treatment in the shock emergency room. Unfallchirurg 106:642–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pohlemann T, Stengel D, Tosounidis G et al (2011) Survival trends and predictors of mortality in severe pelvic trauma: Estimates from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry Initiative. Injury (Epub ahead of print)

  7. Boufous S, Finch C, Lord S, Close J (2005) The increasing burden of pelvic fractures in older people, New South Wales, Australia. Injury 36:1323–1329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell AJ, Reinken J, Allan BC, Martinez GS (1981) Falls in old age: a study of frequency and related clinical factors. Age Ageing 10:264–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lourie H (1982) Spontaneous osteoporotic fracture of the sacrum. An unrecognized syndrome of the elderly. JAMA 248:715–717

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frey ME, DePalma MJ, Cifu DX et al (2008) Percutaneous sacroplasty for osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures: a prospective, multicenter, observational pilot study. Spine J 8:367–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Imai K, Yamamoto S, Anamizu Y, Horiuchi T (2007) Pelvic insufficiency fracture associated with severe suppression of bone turnover by alendronate therapy. J Bone Miner Metab 25:333–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dasgupta B, Shah N, Brown H et al (1998) Sacral insufficiency fractures: an unsuspected cause of low back pain. Br J Rheumatol 37:789–793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schindler OS, Watura R, Cobby M (2007) Sacral insufficiency fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 15:339–346

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rommens PM, Gielen J, Broos PL (1992) The role of CT in diagnosis and therapy of fractures of the pelvic girdle. Unfallchirurg 95:168–173

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rommens PM, Vanderschot PM, Broos PL (1992) Conventional radiography and CT examination of pelvic ring fractures. A comparative study of 90 patients. Unfallchirurg 95:387–392

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rommens PM, Vanderschot PM, De Boodt P, Broos PL (1992) Surgical management of pelvic ring disruptions. Indications, techniques and functional results. Unfallchirurg 95:455–462

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Boehm T et al (2005) Coronal ultra-thick multiplanar CT reconstructions (MPR) of the pelvis in the multiple trauma patient: an alternative for the initial conventional radiograph. Rofo 177:1405–1411

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hak DJ, Smith WR, Suzuki T (2009) Management of hemorrhage in life-threatening pelvic fracture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17:447–457

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pohlemann T, Gansslen A, Stief CH (1998) Complex injuries of the pelvis and acetabulum. Orthopade 27:32–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Henry SM, Pollak AN, Jones AL et al (2002) Pelvic fracture in geriatric patients: a distinct clinical entity. J Trauma 53:15–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Krappinger D, Kammerlander C, Hak DJ, Blauth M (2010) Low-energy osteoporotic pelvic fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:1167–1175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Adunsky A, Kleinbaum Y, Levi R, Arad M (2002) High rate of sacral fractures in elderly patients presenting pubic rami fractures. Harefuah 141:677–679, 763

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pohlemann T, Krettek C, Hoffmann R et al (1994) Biomechanical comparison of various emergency stabilization measures of the pelvic ring. Unfallchirurg 97:503–510

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Leung KS, Tang N, Cheung LW, Ng E (2010) Image-guided navigation in orthopaedic trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1332–1337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Li W, Zhao J (2008) Application of computer assisted orthopedic surgery in orthopedic trauma surgery. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 22:44–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT, Mills WJ (1997) Iliosacral screw fixation: early complications of the percutaneous technique. J Orthop Trauma 11:584–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Altman DT, Jones CB, Routt ML Jr (1999) Superior gluteal artery injury during iliosacral screw placement. J Orthop Trauma 13:220–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee DH, Padhy D, Lee SH et al (2011) Osteoporosis affects component positioning in computer navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee 27:0968–0160

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kendoff D, Gardner MJ, Krettek C et al (2008) Reference markers in computer aided orthopaedic surgery: rotational stability testings and clinical implications. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:633–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Matta JM, Saucedo T (1989) Internal fixation of pelvic ring fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 242:83–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT (1996) Closed reduction and percutaneous skeletal fixation of sacral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329:121–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT, Agnew SG, Mann FA (1996) Radiographic recognition of the sacral alar slope for optimal placement of iliosacral screws: a cadaveric and clinical study. J Orthop Trauma 10:171–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bosch EW van den, Zwienen CM van, Vugt AB van (2002) Fluoroscopic positioning of sacroiliac screws in 88 patients. J Trauma 53:44–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Peng KT, Huang KC, Chen MC et al (2006) Percutaneous placement of iliosacral screws for unstable pelvic ring injuries: comparison between one and two C-arm fluoroscopic techniques. J Trauma 60:602–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kamel EM, Binaghi S, Guntern D et al (2009) Outcome of long-axis percutaneous sacroplasty for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. Eur Radiol 19:3002–3007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mears SC, Sutter EG, Wall SJ et al (2010) Biomechanical comparison of three methods of sacral fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone. Spine 35:392–395

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Keine Angaben

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Fuchs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuchs, T., Rottbeck, U., Hofbauer, V. et al. Beckenringfrakturen im Alter. Unfallchirurg 114, 663–670 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-011-2020-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-011-2020-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation