Skip to main content
Log in

Die Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)

Potenzial und Probleme bei der Anwendung

The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)

Options and problems in application

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Unfallchirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die AIS (Abbreviated Injury Scale) ist von der AAAM (Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine) 2008 mit einem Update herausgegeben worden. Sie ist eines der universellen Scoringwerkzeuge im unfallchirurgischen Fachgebiet mit Einsatzpotenzial in Klinik und Forschung. Die Ingenieurswissenschaften nutzen sie in der Fahrzeugtechnik zur Bewertung der Fahrzeugsicherheit. Damit kann die AIS als internationale, interdisziplinäre und universelle Klassifikation der Verletzungsschwere angesehen werden. Dieser Beitrag liefert einen Überblick zur Historie, Anwendungsmöglichkeit und verbesserten Kodiermöglichkeiten durch die neu erschienene Version. Dabei werden aber auch Probleme aufgezeigt.

Abstract

The new AIS (Abbreviated Injury Scale) was released with an update by the AAAM (Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine) in 2008. It is a universal scoring system in the field of trauma applicable in clinic and research. In engineering it is used as a classification system for vehicle safety. The AIS can therefore be considered as an international, interdisciplinary and universal code of injury severity. This review focuses on a historical overview, potential applications and new coding options in the current version and also outlines the associated problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. American Association for Automotive Medicine (AAAM) (1985) The abbreviated injury scale 1985 revision. Des Plains, IL, Proceedings

  2. Baker SP, O’Neill B (1976) The injury severity score: an update. J Trauma 16:882–885

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB (1974) The injury severity score: a method for describing and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 14:187–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Foltin E, Stockinger A (1999) Effects of injury pattern on the predictability of 4 multiple trauma scores. Presentation of a method for identifying artifacts. Unfallchirurg 102:98–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garthe E, States JD, Mango NK (1999) Abbreviated injury scale unification: the case for a unified injury system for global use. J Trauma 47:309–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Garthe EA (1996) Abbreviated injury scale does not reflect the added morbidity of multiple lower extremity fractures. J Trauma 41:930–931

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gennarelli T (1990) The abbreviated injury scale-1990 revision. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (AAAM), Des Plains, IL, Proceedings

  8. Gennarelli T (1998) The abbreviated injury scale 1990 revision, update 1998. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (AAAM), Barrington, IL, Proceedings

  9. Gennarelli T, Champion HR, Sacco WJ et al (1989) Mortality of patients with head injury and extracranial injury treated in trauma centers. J Trauma 29:1193-1201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gennarelli T, Wodzin E (2006) The abbreviated injury scale 2005. American Association for Automotive Medicine (AAAM), Barrington, IL, Proceedings

  11. Gennarelli T, Wodzin E (2008) The abbreviated injury scale 2005, update 2008. American Association for Automotive Medicine (AAAM), Des Plaines, IL, Proceedings

  12. Harwood PJ, Giannoudis PV, Probst C et al (2006) Which AIS based scoring system is the best predictor of outcome in orthopaedic blunt trauma patients? J Trauma 60:334–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang LC, March JC (1978) AIS and threat to life. American Association for automotive Medicine (AAAM). Proceedings of the AAAM 22:242–254

    Google Scholar 

  14. Joint Commitee of AMA AS (1976) The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 1976 revision. American Association for Automotive Medicine (AAAM). Morton Grove, Il, Proceedings

  15. Joint Committee on Injury Scaling of SAE-AAAM-AMA (1975) The Abbreviated Injury Scale (1975 Revision). American Association for Automotive Medicine (AAAM), San Diego, CA, Proceedings

  16. Keller WK for the AMA Committee on Medical Aspects of Automotive Safety (1971) Rating the severity of tissue damage, I. The abbreviated injury scale. JAMA 215:277–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirk DJ, Lange WA (1968) A detailed injury scale for accident investigation. STAPP Car Crash J 12:240–259

    Google Scholar 

  18. MacKenzie E, Steinwachs DM, Siegel JH (1989) Classifying severity of trauma based on hospital discharge diagnoses, validation of an ICD-9CM to AIS-85 conversion table. Med Care 27:412–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Oestern HJ, Kabus K (1994) Comparison of various trauma score systems. An overview. Unfallchirurg 97:177–184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Otte D (2005) Possibilities of in-depth investigation methodology for injury ans accident prevention on the example of car accidentswith rollover – an in-depth analysis by GIDAS. Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen Fahrzeugtechnik, Heft F55:24–37

  21. States JD (1969) The abbreviated and the comprehensive research injury scales. STAPP Car Crash J 13:282–294

    Google Scholar 

  22. States JD, Huelke DF (1980) The abbreviated injury scale 1980 revision. American Association for Automotive Medicine (AAAM), Morton Grove, Il, Proceedings

  23. States JD, Huelke DF, Harwood PJ (1974) 1974 revision of the AMA-SAE-AAAM Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). American Association for Automotive Medicine (AAAM), Toronto, Canada, Proceedings

  24. Wyatt JP, Beard D, Busuttil A (1998) Quantifying injury and predicting outcome after trauma. Forensic Sci Int 95:57–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor weist auf folgende Verbindungen hin: Die GIDAS wird von der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) und der Forschungsvereinigung Automobiltechnik e.V. (FAT) finanziert.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Haasper M.Sc..

Additional information

Diese Arbeit wurde unter Federführung der AG „Prävention von Verletzungen“ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie e.V. realisiert. Die Autoren CH, AE und HZ sind Mitglieder der AG.

Die Autoren sind Mitglieder der German-in-depth-accident-study- (GIDAS-)Expertengruppe Medizin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haasper, C., Junge, M., Ernstberger, A. et al. Die Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). Unfallchirurg 113, 366–372 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-010-1778-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-010-1778-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation