Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Stress ist ein normaler Bestandteil des anästhesiologisch-notfallmedizinischen Arbeitsalltags.
Ziel der Arbeit
Der vorliegende Beitrag stellt Stresseffekte in komplexen Notfallsituation dar. Hilfestellungen zum Umgang damit werden vorgestellt.
Material und Methode
Hierzu fanden eine Auswertung von Publikationen aus Medizin und Psychologie sowie die Einbeziehung von Expertenmeinungen statt.
Ergebnisse
Negativer Stress beeinflusst Denk- und Kommunikationsprozesse erheblich. Dieser Tatsache wird im klinischen Alltag nur unzureichend Rechnung getragen.
Schlussfolgerungen
Zahlreiche Instrumente zum Umgang mit Stresssituationen sind v. a. aus der Denk- und Kommunikationspsychologie sowie der Luftfahrtforschung verfügbar. Deren Implementierung in die klinische Praxis sollte als sinnvoll erachtet werden.
Abstract
Background
Stress is an integral part of the daily routine among healthcare workers in anesthesiology and emergency medicine.
Objectives
This article describes negative stress effects in complex emergency situations and presents helpful tools for coping with them.
Material and methods
Evaluation and discussion of selected medical and psychological publications and the inclusion of expert opinions are presented.
Results
Negative stress of healthcare providers in medical emergencies severely affects their reasoning and communication and is inadequately taken into account during routine care.
Conclusion
Research in aviation and psychology has provided various tools to improve performance during stressful events and should be taken into consideration for routine daily use.
Literatur
Chopra V, Gesink BJ, Jong J de et al (1994) Does training on an anaesthesia simulator lead to improvement in performance? Br J Anaesth 73(3):293–297
Dietrich R, Grommes P, Neuper S (2004) Language processing. In: Dietrich R, Childress TM (Hrsg) Group interaction in high risk environments. Ashgate, Aldershot, S 87–100
Dietrich R, Silberstein D (2003) Cockpit communication under high cognitive workload. In: Dietrich R, Meltzer TV (Hrsg) Communication in high risk environments. Buske, Hamburg, S 9–56
Dörner D, Pfeifer E (1991) Strategisches Denken und Stress. Z Psychol 51(11):71–83
Dörner D, Schaub H (1994) Errors in planning and decision making in the nature of human information processing. Appl Psychol Int Rev 43:433–455
Gaba DM (2010) Crisis resource management and teamwork in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 105(1):3–6
Gaba DM, Fish KJ, Howard SK (1994) Crisis management in anaesthesiology. Churchill Livingstone, New York
Gaba DM, Howard SK, Fish KJ et al (2001) Simulation based training in anaesthesia crisis resource management (ACRM): a decade of experience. Simulation Gaming 32:175–193
Gottschalk A (2013) Patientensicherheit in der Anästhesie. Anaesthesiol Intensivmed 12:636–647
Helmreich RL (1997) Managing human error in aviation. Sci Am 276(5):62–67
Helmreich RL, Davies JM (1997) Anaesthetic simulation and lessons to be learned from aviation. Can J Anaesth 44(9):907–912
Holzman RS, Cooper JB, Gaba DM et al (1995) Anaesthesia crisis resource management: real-life simulation training in operating room crises. J Clin Anaesth 7(8):675–687
Kaufmann J, Laschat M, Wappler F (2013) Medikamentenfehler bei Kindernotfällen. Ursachen und Lösungsansätze. Anaesth Intensivmed 54:286–294
Lasogga F, Gasch B (Hrsg) (2011) Notfallpsychologie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio
Lubitz DS, Seidel JS, Chameides L et al (1988) A rapid method for estimating weight and resuscitation drug dosages from length in the pediatric age group. Ann Emerg Med 17:576–581
McCreary J, Pollard M, Stevenson K, Wilson MB (2008) Human factors: Tenerife revisited. Air Transport World 3(1):24–31
Meichenbaum D (2003) Intervention bei Stress. Anwendung und Wirkung des Stressimpfungstrainings. Huber, Bern
Milke K, Zacharowski K (2013) Deklaration von Helsinki zur Patientensicherheit in der Anästhesiologie – Empfehlungen zur Einführung von Spritzenetiketten. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 48:98–100
Mueller G, Hunt B, Wall V et al (2012) Intensive skills week for military medical students increases technical proficiency, confidence, and skills to minimize negative stress. J Spec Oper Med 12(4):45–53
Provonost P et al (2006) An intervention to decrease catheter related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 355(26):2725–2732
Rall M, Gaba DM (2009) Human performance and patient safety. In: Miller RD (Hrsg) Miller’s anaesthesia. Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, S 93–150
Rall M, Glavin R, Flin R (2008) The „10 sec. for 10 min principle“ – Why things go wrong and stopping them getting worse. Bulletin of The Royal College of Anaesthetists – Special human factors issue (51):2614–2616
Raymond JE, O’Brien JL (2009) Selective visual attention and motivation: the consequences of value learning in an attentional blink task. Psychol Sci 20(8):981–988
Schiechtl B, Hunger MS, Schwappach DL et al (2013) Second victim: critical incident stress management in der klinischen Medizin. Anaesthesist 62(9):734–741
Schulz von Thun F (2000) Miteinander reden. Rowohlt, Reinbeck bei Hamburg
Schwabe L, Tegenthoff M, Höffken O, Wolf OT (2012) Simultaneous glucocorticoid and noradrenergic activity disrupts the neural basis of goal-directed action in the human brain. J Neurosci 32(30):10146–10155
Selye H (1936) A syndrome produced by diverse nocuous agents. Nature 138:32
Selye H (1974) Stress without distress. Lippincott, Philadelphia
Sexton JB (Hrsg) (2004) The better the team, the safer the world. Golden rules for group interaction in high risk environments: evidence based suggestions for improving performance. Ladenburg & Rüschlikon, Gottlieb Daimler and Karl Benz Foundation, Ladenburg
Sexton JB, Helmreich RL (2000) Analyzing cockpit communications: the links between language, performance, error, and workload. Hum Perf Extrem Environ 5(1):63–68
Sexton JB, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL (2000) Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. BMJ 320:745–749
Ungerer D, Morgenroth U (2001) Analyse des menschlichen Fehlverhaltens in Gefahrensituationen. Zivilschutzforschung, Bd 43. Zentralstelle für Zivilschutz, Bonn
Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien
Interessenkonflikt. B. Vetter, B. Gasch und S.A. Padosch geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vetter, B., Gasch, B. & Padosch, S. Medizinisches Handeln in komplexen Notfallsituationen. Anaesthesist 64, 298–303 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-015-2423-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-015-2423-2