Zusammenfassung
Der Larynxtubus (LT) gewinnt zunehmend auch in der Notfallmedizin an Bedeutung. Es wird über 2 Patienten berichtet, bei denen es im Rahmen einer präklinischen Atemwegssicherung mithilfe des LT zu einer schwerwiegenden Aspiration bzw. einer gastralen Luftinsufflation mit Unmöglichkeit der Beatmung kam. Die zu diesen Ereignissen führenden Pathomechanismen, deren Erkennung und Behebung werden diskutiert.
Abstract
Laryngeal tubes (LT) are increasingly being used for emergency airway management. This article reports on two patients in whom out-of-hospital intubation with a single-lumen LT was associated with massive pulmonary aspiration in one patient and gastric overinflation in the other. In both cases peak inspiratory pressures exceeded the LT leak pressure of approximately 35 mbar. This resulted in gastric inflation and decreased pulmonary compliance and increased inspiratory pressure further, thereby creating a vicious circle. It is therefore recommended that laryngeal tube suction (LTS) should be used in all cases of emergency airway management and a gastric drain tube be inserted through the dedicated second lumen. Apart from gastric overinflation, incorrect LT/LTS placement must be detected and immediately corrected, e.g. in cases of difficult or impossible gastric tube placement, permanent drainage of air from the gastric tube, decreasing minute ventilation or an ascending capnography curve.
Literatur
Cavus E, Kieckhaefer J, Doerges V et al (2010) The C-MAC videolaryngoscope: first experiences with a new device for videolaryngoscopy-guided intubation. Anesth Analg 110:473–477
Dörges V, Ocker H, Wenzel V et al (2003) The laryngeal tube S: a modified simple airway device. Anesth Analg 96:618–621
Dörges V, Ocker H, Wenzel V, Schmucker P (2000) The laryngeal tube: a new simple airway device. Anesth Analg 90:1220–1222
Finteis T, Genzwürker H, Becker FS, Ellinger K (2001) Einsatz des Larynxtubus bei einem polytraumatisierten Patienten. Notfall Rettungsmed 4:511–514
Gaitini LA, Vaida SJ, Somri M et al (2004) A randomized controlled trial comparing the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the laryngeal tube suction in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 101:316–320
Gabrielli A, Wenzel V, Layon AJ et al (2005) Lower esophageal sphincter pressure measurement during cardiac arrest in humans: potential implication for ventilation of the unprotected airway. Anesthesiology 103:897–899
Genzwuerker HV, Dhonau S, Ellinger K (2002) Use of the laryngeal tube for out-of-hospital resuscitation. Resuscitation 52:221–224
Kikuchi T, Kamiya Y, Ohtsuka T et al (2008) Randomized prospective study comparing the laryngeal tube suction II with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized and paralyzed patients. Anesthesiology 109:54–60
Ocker H, Wenzel V, Schmucker P et al (2000) A comparison of the laryngeal tube with the laryngeal mask airway during routine surgical procedures. Anesth Analg 95:1094–1097
Schalk R, Byhahn C, Fausel F et al (2010) Out-of-hospital airway management by paramedics and emergency physicians using laryngeal tubes. Resuscitation 81:323–326
Scheller B, Walcher F, Byhahn C et al (2010) Larynxtubus Suction. Temporäres Hilfsmittel bei Notfallpatienten mit schwierigem Atemweg. Anaesthesist 59:210–216
Thierbach A, Piepho T, Wolcke B et al (2004) Präklinische Sicherung der Atemwege. Erfolgsraten und Komplikationen. Anaesthesist 53:543–550
Trauth B, Dedores A, Friedrich M, Genzwürker H (2009) Atemwegsmanagement mit dem LTS-D während der Reanimation. Notfall Rettungsmed 12:130–132
Wenzel V, Idris AH, Banner MJ et al (1998) Respiratory system compliance decreases after cardiopulmonary resuscitation and stomach inflation: impact of large and small tidal volumes on calculated peak airway pressure. Resuscitation 38:113–118
Interessenkonflikt
Keine Angaben
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dengler, V., Wilde, P., Byhahn, C. et al. Präklinische Anwendung des Larynxtubus. Anaesthesist 60, 135–138 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-010-1774-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-010-1774-y