Skip to main content
Log in

Präklinische Anwendung des Larynxtubus

Bietet der Larynxtubus S mit Magensonde Vorteile in der Notfallmedizin?

Prehospital airway management of laryngeal tubes

Should the laryngeal tube S with gastric drain tube be preferred in emergency medicine?

  • Kasuistiken
  • Published:
Der Anaesthesist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Der Larynxtubus (LT) gewinnt zunehmend auch in der Notfallmedizin an Bedeutung. Es wird über 2 Patienten berichtet, bei denen es im Rahmen einer präklinischen Atemwegssicherung mithilfe des LT zu einer schwerwiegenden Aspiration bzw. einer gastralen Luftinsufflation mit Unmöglichkeit der Beatmung kam. Die zu diesen Ereignissen führenden Pathomechanismen, deren Erkennung und Behebung werden diskutiert.

Abstract

Laryngeal tubes (LT) are increasingly being used for emergency airway management. This article reports on two patients in whom out-of-hospital intubation with a single-lumen LT was associated with massive pulmonary aspiration in one patient and gastric overinflation in the other. In both cases peak inspiratory pressures exceeded the LT leak pressure of approximately 35 mbar. This resulted in gastric inflation and decreased pulmonary compliance and increased inspiratory pressure further, thereby creating a vicious circle. It is therefore recommended that laryngeal tube suction (LTS) should be used in all cases of emergency airway management and a gastric drain tube be inserted through the dedicated second lumen. Apart from gastric overinflation, incorrect LT/LTS placement must be detected and immediately corrected, e.g. in cases of difficult or impossible gastric tube placement, permanent drainage of air from the gastric tube, decreasing minute ventilation or an ascending capnography curve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Cavus E, Kieckhaefer J, Doerges V et al (2010) The C-MAC videolaryngoscope: first experiences with a new device for videolaryngoscopy-guided intubation. Anesth Analg 110:473–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dörges V, Ocker H, Wenzel V et al (2003) The laryngeal tube S: a modified simple airway device. Anesth Analg 96:618–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dörges V, Ocker H, Wenzel V, Schmucker P (2000) The laryngeal tube: a new simple airway device. Anesth Analg 90:1220–1222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Finteis T, Genzwürker H, Becker FS, Ellinger K (2001) Einsatz des Larynxtubus bei einem polytraumatisierten Patienten. Notfall Rettungsmed 4:511–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaitini LA, Vaida SJ, Somri M et al (2004) A randomized controlled trial comparing the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the laryngeal tube suction in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 101:316–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gabrielli A, Wenzel V, Layon AJ et al (2005) Lower esophageal sphincter pressure measurement during cardiac arrest in humans: potential implication for ventilation of the unprotected airway. Anesthesiology 103:897–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Genzwuerker HV, Dhonau S, Ellinger K (2002) Use of the laryngeal tube for out-of-hospital resuscitation. Resuscitation 52:221–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kikuchi T, Kamiya Y, Ohtsuka T et al (2008) Randomized prospective study comparing the laryngeal tube suction II with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized and paralyzed patients. Anesthesiology 109:54–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ocker H, Wenzel V, Schmucker P et al (2000) A comparison of the laryngeal tube with the laryngeal mask airway during routine surgical procedures. Anesth Analg 95:1094–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schalk R, Byhahn C, Fausel F et al (2010) Out-of-hospital airway management by paramedics and emergency physicians using laryngeal tubes. Resuscitation 81:323–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scheller B, Walcher F, Byhahn C et al (2010) Larynxtubus Suction. Temporäres Hilfsmittel bei Notfallpatienten mit schwierigem Atemweg. Anaesthesist 59:210–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thierbach A, Piepho T, Wolcke B et al (2004) Präklinische Sicherung der Atemwege. Erfolgsraten und Komplikationen. Anaesthesist 53:543–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Trauth B, Dedores A, Friedrich M, Genzwürker H (2009) Atemwegsmanagement mit dem LTS-D während der Reanimation. Notfall Rettungsmed 12:130–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wenzel V, Idris AH, Banner MJ et al (1998) Respiratory system compliance decreases after cardiopulmonary resuscitation and stomach inflation: impact of large and small tidal volumes on calculated peak airway pressure. Resuscitation 38:113–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Keine Angaben

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Schalk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dengler, V., Wilde, P., Byhahn, C. et al. Präklinische Anwendung des Larynxtubus. Anaesthesist 60, 135–138 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-010-1774-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-010-1774-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation