Skip to main content
Log in

Glasgow Coma Score für den Patienten mit Schädel-Hirn-Trauma

Glasgow Coma Scale in traumatic brain injury

  • Weiterbildung · Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Anaesthesist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Der Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) wird auch heute noch, 30 Jahre nach seiner Erstbeschreibung, weltweit verwendet, um komatöse Zustände zu quantifizieren. Die Evaluation dreier Komponenten, der okulären, motorischen und verbalen Antwort auf einen auditiven oder nozizeptiven Stimulus, erlaubt die Einteilung eines Schädel-Hirn-Traumas in 3 Schweregrade, erleichtert die Informationsübermittlung und ermöglicht eine Verlaufsbeobachtung. Als Triage-Instrument darf der initiale GCS verwendet werden, sein prognostischer Wert für das Outcome nach Schädel-Hirn-Trauma ist jedoch noch immer nicht eindeutig definiert. Bis heute ungelöst ist der Problemfall der Beurteilung eines sedierten, relaxierten und/oder intubierten Patienten. Nach wie vor fehlt ein Konsensus für die in solchen Fällen angewandten Pseudoscores, was eine der Hauptkritiken am GCS ist.

Abstract

Even 30 years after its first publication the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is still used worldwide to describe and assess coma. The GCS consists of three components, the ocular, motor and verbal response to standardized stimulation, and is used as a severity of illness indicator for coma of various origins. The GCS facilitates information transfer and monitoring changes in coma. In addition, it is used as a triage tool in patients with traumatic brain injury. Its prognostic value regarding the outcome after a traumatic brain injury still lacks evidence. One of the main problems is the evaluation of the GCS in sedated, paralysed and/or intubated patients. A multitude of pseudoscores exists but a universal definition has yet to be defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Brain Trauma Foundation, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care (1996) Guidelines for the management of severe head injury. J Neurotrauma 13:641–734

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brain Trauma Foundation. American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care (2000) Hypotension. J Neurotrauma 17:591–595

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Salamah MA, McDowell I, Stiell IG et al. (2004) Initial emergency department trauma scores from the OPALS study: the case for the motor score in blunt trauma. Acad Emerg Med 11:834–842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Balestreri M, Czosnyka M, Chatfield DA et al. (2004) Predictive value of Glasgow Coma Scale after brain trauma: change in trend over the past ten years. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:161–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Born JD, Albert A, Hans P et al. (1985) Relative prognostic value of best motor response and brain stem reflexes in patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 16:595–601

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bouillon B, Lefering R, Vorweg M et al. (1997) Trauma score systems: Cologne Validation Study. J Trauma 42:652–658

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen LM, Martin CM, Morrison TL et al. (1999) Interobserver variability in data collection of the APACHE II score in teaching and community hospitals. Crit Care Med 27:1999–2004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi SC, Narayan RK, Anderson RL et al. (1988) Enhanced specificity of prognosis in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 69:381–385

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Demetriades D, Kuncir E, Murray J et al. (2004) Mortality prediction of head Abbreviated Injury Score and Glasgow Coma Scale: analysis of 7,764 head injuries. J Am Coll Surg 199:216–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Diringer MN, Edwards DF (1997) Does modification of the Innsbruck and the Glasgow Coma Scales improve their ability to predict functional outcome? Arch Neurol 54:606–611

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Healey C, Osler TM, Rogers FB et al. (2003) Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale score: motor score alone is a better predictor. J Trauma 54:671–678; discussion 678–680

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jagger J, Jane JA, Rimel R (1983) The Glasgow coma scale: to sum or not to sum? Lancet 2:97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jennett B, Plum F (1972) Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. A syndrome in search of a name. Lancet 1:734–737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jennett B, Bond M (1975) Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1:480–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jennett B (1976) Assessment of the severity of head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 39:647–655

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jennett B, Teasdale G (1977) Aspects of coma after severe head injury. Lancet 1:878–881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jennett B, Teasdale G, Galbraith S et al. (1977) Severe head injuries in three countries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40:291–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Koziol JA, Hacke W (1990) Multivariate data reduction by principal components, with application to neurological scoring instruments. J Neurol 237:461–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuhls DA, Malone DL, McCarter RJ et al. (2002) Predictors of mortality in adult trauma patients: the physiologic trauma score is equivalent to the Trauma and Injury Severity Score. J Am Coll Surg 194:695–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Levy DE, Bates D, Caronna JJ et al. (1981) Prognosis in nontraumatic coma. Ann Intern Med 94:293–301

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lucke JF (1996) Student’s t test and the Glasgow Coma Scale. Ann Emerg Med 28:408–413

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marion DW, Carlier PM (1994) Problems with initial Glasgow Coma Scale assessment caused by prehospital treatment of patients with head injuries: results of a national survey. J Trauma 36:89–95

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marshall LF, Becker DP, Bowers SA et al. (1983) The National Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Part 1: Design, purpose, goals, and results. J Neurosurg 59:276–284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Meredith W, Rutledge R, Hansen AR et al. (1995) Field triage of trauma patients based upon the ability to follow commands: a study in 29,573 injured patients. J Trauma 38:129–135

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Meredith W, Rutledge R, Fakhry SM et al. (1998) The conundrum of the Glasgow Coma Scale in intubated patients: a linear regression prediction of the Glasgow verbal score from the Glasgow eye and motor scores. J Trauma 44:839–844; discussion 844–835

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nolan JP, Parr MJ (1997) Aspects of resuscitation in trauma. Br J Anaesth 79:226–240

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Prasad K (1996) The Glasgow Coma Scale: a critical appraisal of its clinimetric properties. J Clin Epidemiol 49:755–763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rowley G, Fielding K (1991) Reliability and accuracy of the Glasgow Coma Scale with experienced and inexperienced users. Lancet 337:535–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sacco RL, VanGool R, Mohr JP et al. (1990) Nontraumatic coma. Glasgow coma score and coma etiology as predictors of 2-week outcome. Arch Neurol 47:1181–1184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Segatore M, Way C (1992) The Glasgow Coma Scale: time for change. Heart Lung 21:548–557

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Senkowski CK, McKenney MG (1999) Trauma scoring systems: a review. J Am Coll Surg 189:491–503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974) Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2:81–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Teasdale G, Galbraith S, Clarke K (1975) Acute impairment of brain function-2. Observation record chart. Nurs Times 71:972–973

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Teasdale G (1976) Assessment of head injuries. Br J Anaesth 48:761–766

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Teasdale G, Jennett B (1976) Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 34:45–55

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Teasdale G, Murray G, Parker L et al. (1979) Adding up the Glasgow Coma Score. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 28:13–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Teoh LS, Gowardman JR, Larsen PD et al. (2000) Glasgow Coma Scale: variation in mortality among permutations of specific total scores. Intensive Care Med 26:157–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Udekwu P, Kromhout-Schiro S, Vaslef S et al. (2004) Glasgow Coma Scale score, mortality, and functional outcome in head-injured patients. J Trauma 56:1084–1089

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vassar MJ, Lewis FR Jr, Chambers JA et al. (1999) Prediction of outcome in intensive care unit trauma patients: a multicenter study of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE), Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), and a 24-hour intensive care unit (ICU) point system. J Trauma 47:324–329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Heim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heim, C., Schoettker, P. & Spahn, D.R. Glasgow Coma Score für den Patienten mit Schädel-Hirn-Trauma. Anaesthesist 53, 1245–1256 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-004-0777-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-004-0777-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation