Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Paradigm shift in geriatric fracture treatment

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The number of geriatric patients is increasing. These patients exhibit specific characteristics, which influence the type of fracture care. Many patients have comorbidities, which make them more vulnerable to surgical procedures. The soft tissue envelope around the fracture often is compromised due to pre-existing diseases such as diabetes, chronic venous insufficiency or peripheral vascular disease. Bone mineral density has decreased, which enhances the risk of implant loosening. The goals of treatment differ from those, which are valid for younger adults. Primary goal is preserving independency of the elderly patient in his activities of daily life. Advantages and drawbacks of surgical procedures have to be balanced with those of conservative treatment. Fractures of the lower extremities will more often need surgical treatment than fractures of the upper extremities. Patient´s autonomy is best obtained by creating high stability in the fracture plane, which enables motion and weight-bearing. Second priority is prevention of general and local post-operative complications by the use of less invasive surgical procedures. Restoring anatomy and optimal function are less important goals. The implants, which are used, are inserted through small incisions, placed deep under the skin and use long anatomic or osseous corridors. Intramedullary devices have important advantages. This paradigm shift takes the special challenges and requirements of geriatric patients into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

(From Seligson D, Severance D, Roberts C. Distal femur. Figure 20.4 of Chap. 20 in “Intramedullary Nailing. A comprehensive guide.” (Rommens PM, Hessmann MH. Eds) Springer-Verlag London 2015 pp. 317–329. With permission)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/684349/umfrage/altersmedian-der-bevoelkerung-in-g20-staaten/.

  2. https://www.geoba.se/country.php?cc=DE.

  3. Nikkel LE, Fox EJ, Black KP, Davis C, Andersen L, Hollenbeak CS. Impact of comorbidities on hospitalization costs following hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(1):9–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McMahon DJ, Shapiro MB, Kauder DR. The injured elderly in the trauma intensive care unit. Surg Clin North Am. 2000;80:1005–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J, McCloskey EV, Jönsson B, Kanis JA. Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8:136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Watts NB. The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®): applications in clinical practice. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011;20(4):525–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dachverband Osteologie eV, Prophylaxe. Diagnostik und Therapie der Osteoporose bei postmenopausalen Frauen und bei Männern. Version 2017. Langfassung. AWMF-Register-Nr. 183/001, 216 pages.

  8. Cheng SY, Levy AR, Lefaivre KA, Guy P, Kuramoto L, Sobolev B. Geographic trends in incidence of hip fractures: a comprehensive literature review. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(10):2575–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rommens PM, Hofmann A. Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: Recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury. 2013;44(12):1733–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Andrich S, Haastert B, Neuhaus E, Neidert K, Arend W, Ohmann C, Grebe J, Vogt A, Jungbluth P, Thelen S, Windolf J, Icks A. Excess mortality after pelvic fractures among older people. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(9):1789–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heim UFA. Das Phänomen AO. Gründung und erste Jahre der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für das Studium der Osteosynthese. German: Verlag Hans Huber Bern-Göttingen-Toronto-Seattle; 2001. p. 246.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bukata SV, Digiovanni BF, Friedmann SM, et al. A guide to improving the care of patients with fragility fractures. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2011;2(1):5–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Böhler L. Die Technik der Knochenbruchbehandlung. 12. und 13. vollständig neubearbeitete Auflage. Verlag für medizinische Wissenschaften. Band 1. Wien-Düsseldorf: Wilhelm Maudrich; 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lambotte A. L’Intervention opératoire dans les fractures récentes et anciennes envisage particulièremnt au point de vue de l’ostéosynthese avec la description de plusieurs techniques nouvelles. Brussels: Henri Lamertin, Libraire-Éditeur; 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Danis R. Théorie et pratique de l’ostéosynthese. Masson et cie. Paris, 1949, 296 pages. French.

  16. Küntscher G. Praxis der Marknagelung. Handschriftlich nach 1. Auflage 1962 überarbeitete bisher unveröffentlichte 2. Ausgabe von 1972. Reprint bei Karger 1986. 349 pages. German.

  17. Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Willenegger H. Manual of internal fixation. Technique recommended by the AO-group. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer Verlag; 1969. 298 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  18. SooHoo NF, Krenek L, Eagan MJ, Gurbani B, Ko CY, Zingmond DS. Complication rates following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(5):1042–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Koso RE, Terhoeve C, Steen RG, Zura R. Healing, nonunion, and re-operation after internal fixation of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3864-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Steinau HU, Hebebrand D, Vogt P, Josten C. [Plastic soft tissue coverage in defect fractures of the tibia]. Chirurg. 1996;67(11):1080–6. (German).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaunder CL, Zhao Z, Henderson C, McKinney BR, Stahel PF, Zelle BA. Wound complications after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures in the elderly: a multicentre study. Int Orthop. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3940-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mast J, Jakob R, Ganz R. Planning and reduction technique in fracture surgery. Berlin: Springer; 1989. p. 272.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Guy P, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: does percutaneous plating disrupt femoral blood supply less than the traditional technique? J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13(6):401–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Perren SM, Cordey J, Rahn BA, Gautier E, Schneider E. Early temporary porosis of bone induced by internal fixation implants. A reaction to necrosis, not to stress protection? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(232):139–51.

  25. Wagner M, Frigg R. AO manual of fracture management. Internal fixators. Concepts and cases using LCP/LISS. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme; 2006. p. 888.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Babst R, Bavonratanavech S, Pesantes R. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), 2nd edition. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme; 2012. p. 784.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tornetta P, Mostafavi H, Riina J, Turen C, Reimer B, Levine R, Behrens F, Geller J, Ritter C, Homel P. Morbidity and mortality in elderly trauma patients. J Trauma. 1999;46(4):702–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Grossmann MD, Miller D, Scaff DW, Arcona S. When is an elder old? Effect of preexisting conditions on mortality in geriatric trauma. J Trauma. 2002;52(2):242–6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pernod G, Albaladejo P, Godier A, Samama CM, Susen S, Gruel Y, Blais N, Fontana P, Cohen A, Llau JV, Rosencher N, Schved JF, de Maistre E, Samama MM, Mismetti P, Sié P. [Management of major bleeding complications and emergency surgery in patients on long-term treatment with direct oral anticoagulants, thrombin or factor-Xa inhibitors. Proposals of the Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP) - March 2013]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2013;32.(10):691–700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramly E, Kaafarani HM, Velmahos GC. The effect of aging on pulmonary function: implications for monitoring and support of the surgical and trauma patient. Surg Clin North Am. 2015;95(1):53–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Loftus TJ, Brakenridge SC, Murphy TW, Nguyen LL, Moore FA, Efron PA, Mohr AM. Anemia and blood transfusion in elderly trauma patients. J Surg Res. 2018;229:288–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Thaeter M, Knobe M, Vande Kerckhove M, Böhle F, Herold J, Verhaven E, Pape HC. Perioperative inflammatory response in major fracture: do geriatric patients behave differently? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42(5):547–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tsuei BJ, Kearney PA. Hypothermia in the trauma patient. Injury. 2004;35(1):7–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hoppe S, Uhlmann M, Schwyn R, Suhm N, Benneker LM. Intraoperative mechanical measurement of bone quality with the DensiProbe. J Clin Densitom. 2015;18(1):109–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hepp P, Lill H, Bail H, Korner J, Niederhagen M, Haas NP, Josten C, Duda GN. Where should implants be anchored in the humeral head? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;(415):139–47.

  36. Kamer L, Noser H, Blauth M, Lenz M, Windolf M, Popp AW. Bone mass distribution of the distal tibia in normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic conditions: an ex vivo assessment using HR-pQCT, DXA, and computational modelling. Calcif Tissue Int. 2016;99(6):588–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wagner D, Kamer L, Sawaguchi T, Richards GR, Noser H, Rommens PM. Sacral bone mass distribution of the sacrum assessed by averaged 3D CT statistical models—implications for pathogenesis and treatment of fragility fractures of the sacrum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:584–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lanzetti RM, Lupariello D, Venditto T, Guzzini M, Ponzo A, De Carli A, Ferretti A. The role of diabetes mellitus and BMI in the surgical treatment of ankle fractures. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2018;34(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2954.

  39. Krettek C, Wiebking U. [Proximal humerus fracture: is fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis superior to conservative treatment?]. Unfallchirurg. 2011;114(12):1059–67. (German).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen Y, Chen X, Li Z, Yan H, Zhou F, Gao W. Safety and efficacy of operative versus nonsurgical management of distal radius fractures in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41(3):404–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gruszka D, Dietz SO, Brodt R, Wagner D, Kuhn S, Rommens PM, Kuechle R. Results of the treatment of intracapsular femoral neck fractures with a new dynamic locking plate. Acta orthop belg. 2017;83(4):536–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou Z, Zhang X, Tian S, Wu Y. Minimally invasive versus conventional dynamic hip screw for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in older patients. Orthopedics 2012;35(2):e244-9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Savage JW, Schroeder GD, Anderson PA. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22(10):653–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Frey ME, Warner C, Thomas SM, Johar K, Singh H, Mohammad MS, Beall DP. Sacroplasty: a ten-year analysis of prospective patients treated with percutaneous sacroplasty: literature review and technical considerations. Pain Physician. 2017;20(7):E1063–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cornell CN. Internal fracture fixation in patients with osteoporosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11(2):109–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rommens PM, Pairon P, Kuhn S. [Nailing of metaphyseal fractures]. Unfallchirurg. 2013;116(9):831–46. German.

  47. White TO, Bugler KE, Appleton P, Will E, McQueen MM, Court-Brown CM. A prospective randomised controlled trial of the fibular nail versus standard open reduction and internal fixation for fixation of ankle fractures in elderly patients. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(9):1248–52.

  48. Smeets B, Hoekstra H. Fibular nailing seems an effective strategy to decrease treatment crude costs for AO-Type 44B ankle fractures in elderly patients. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 ;55(3):684–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kuhn S, Appelmann P, Pairon P, Mehler D, Hartmann F, Rommens P. A new angle stable nailing concept for the treatment of distal tibia fractures. Int Orthop. 2014;38:1255–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Zwipp H, Paša L, Žilka L, Amlang M, Rammelt S, Pompach M. Introduction of a New Locking Nail for Treatment of Intraarticular Calcaneal Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(3):e88–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Halvorson TL, Kelley LA, Thomas KA, Whitecloud TS, Cook SD. Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(21):2415–20.

  52. Weiser L, Dreimann M, Huber G, Sellenschloh K, Püschel K, Morlock MM, Rueger JM, Lehmann W. Cement augmentation versus extended dorsal instrumentation in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a biomechanical comparison. Bone Joint J 2016;98-B(8):1099–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hoppe S, Keel MJ. Pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic spine: indications, limitations and technical aspects. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2017;43(1):3–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. El Saman A, Meier S, Sander A, Kelm A, Marzi I, Laurer H. Reduced loosening rate and loss of correction following posterior stabilization with or without PMMA augmentation of pedicle screws in vertebral fractures in the elderly. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2013;39(5):455–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rommens PM, Wagner D, Hofmann A. Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis. JBJS Rev 2017;5:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mehling I, Hessmann MH, Rommens PM. Stabilisation of fatigue fractures of the dorsal pelvis with a trans-sacral bar. Operative technique and outcome. Injury. 2012;43:446–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Rommens PM. Is there a role for percutaneous pelvic and acetabular reconstruction? Injury 2007;38(4):463–477.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rommens PM, Wagner D, Hofmann A. Minimal invasive surgical treatment of fragility fractures of the Pelvis. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2017;112(5):524–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Vanderschot P. Treatment options of pelvic and acetabular fractures in patients with osteoporotic bone. Injury 2007;38(4):497–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Jeffcoat DM, Carroll EA, Huber FG, Goldman AT, Miller AN, Lorich DG, Helfet DL. Operative treatment of acetabular fractures in an older population through a limited ilioinguinal approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(5):284–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bastian JD, Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Keel MJ. Mid-term results in relation to age and analysis of predictive factors after fixation of acetabular fractures using the modified Stoppa approach. Injury 2013;44(12):1793–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There was no funding for this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pol Maria Rommens.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

He has is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval is not applicable for this manuscript.

Informed consent

Informed consent is not applicable for this manuscript.

Additional information

Otmar Trentz lecture at the 20th European Congress for Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Prague, May 5th 2019.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rommens, P.M. Paradigm shift in geriatric fracture treatment. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 45, 181–189 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01080-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01080-x

Keywords

Navigation