Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Empfehlungen zur Ultraschallausbildung in der internistischen Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin: Positionspapier der DGIIN, DEGUM und DGK

Recommendations for education in ultrasound in medical intensive care and emergency medicine: position paper of DGIIN, DEGUM and DGK

  • Positionspapier
  • Published:
Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Point-of-care-Sonographie bildet in der Akutmedizin die Voraussetzung in der Diagnostik und Therapiesteuerung von kritisch kranken Patienten. Bisher existiert kein einheitliches Ausbildungskonzept für die internistische Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin. Im Rahmen eines Basislevels erfährt der Auszubildende eine grundlegende theoretische und klinisch-praktische Ultraschallausbildung sowohl in der Abdomen- und Thoraxsonographie als auch in der fokussierten kardiovaskulären Sonographie. In einem 2. Schritt können spezielle Kenntnisse auf Expertenniveau erworben werden. Dieses 2‑stufige Ausbildungskonzept dient der Qualitätssicherung in der Sonographie in der internistischen Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin.

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound in acute care medicine is a prerequisite for diagnosis and therapy monitoring of critically ill patients. There is currently no uniform education strategy for medical intensive care and emergency medicine. As part of the basic level, the trainee takes theoretical and clinical training covering abdominal and thoracic ultrasonography and focused cardiovascular ultrasound. In a second step, special knowledge and skills can be acquired at an expert level. This two-stage concept is intended to guarantee quality assurance in ultrasound education in medical intensive care and emergency medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Kirkpatrick AW, Sirois M, Laupland KB et al (2004) Hand-held thoracic sonography for detecting post-traumatic pneumothoraces: the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (EFAST). J Trauma 57:288–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dorman T, Angood PB, Angus DC et al (2004) Guidelines for critical care medicine training and continuing medical education. Crit Care Med 32:263–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beaulieu Y, Marik PE (2005) Bedside ultrasonography in the ICU: part 1. Chest 128:881–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beaulieu Y, Marik PE (2005) Bedside ultrasonography in the ICU: part 2. Chest 128:1766–1781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Michels G, Breitkreutz R, Pfister R (2014) Value of lung ultrasound in emergency and intensive care medicine. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 139(45):2301–2307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore CL, Copel JA (2011) Current concepts point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 364:749–757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frankel HL, Kirkpatrick AW, Elbarbary M et al (2015) Guidelines for the appropriate use of bedside general and cardiac ultrasonography in the evaluation of critically ill patients. Part I: general ultrasonography. Crit Care Med 43(11):2479–2502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown SM, Kasal J (2015) Bedside ultrasound in the intensive care unit: Where is the evidence? Semin Respir Crit Care Med 36(6):878–889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Levitov A, Frankel HL, Blaivas M (2016) Guidelines for the appropriate use of bedside general and cardiac ultrasonography in the evaluation of critically ill patients. Part II: cardiac ultrasonography. Crit Care Med 44(6):1206–1227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chelly J, Deye N, Guichard JP et al (2016) The optic nerve sheath diameter as a useful tool for early prediction of outcome after cardiac arrest: a prospective pilot study. Resuscitation 103:7–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gobatto AL, Besen BA, Tierno PF (2016) Ultrasound-guided percutaneous dilational tracheostomy versus bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in critically ill patients (TRACHUS): a randomized noninferiority controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 42(3):342–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Whitson MR, Mayo PH (2016) Ultrasonography in the emergency department. Crit Care 20(1):227. doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1399-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Breitkreutz R, Campo dell’ Orto M, Hamm C et al (2013) Does the integration of personalized ultrasound change patient management in critical care medicine? Observational trials. Emerg Med Int. doi:10.1155/2013/946059

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang X, Liu D, He H et al (2015) Using critical care chest ultrasonic examination in emergency consultation: a pilot study. Ultrasound Med Biol 41(2):401–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dietrich CF, Goudie A, Chiorean L (2016) Point of care ultrasound: a WFUMB position paper. Ultrasound Med Biol 43(1):49–58. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.06.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Neri L, Storti E, Lichtenstein D (2007) Toward an ultrasound curriculum for critical care medicine. Crit Care Med 35(5 Suppl):S290–S304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hagendorff A, Tiemann K, Simonis G et al (2013) Empfehlungen zur Notfallechokardiographie. Kardiologe 8:45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Neskovic AN, Hagendorff A, Lancellotti P et al (2013) Emergency echocardiography – the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging recommendations. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 14:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD et al (2016) 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 37:2129–2200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:233–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M et al (2012) International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med 38(4):577–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Via G, Hussain A, Wells M et al (2014) International evidence-based recommendations for focused cardiac ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 27(7):683.e1–683.e33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ayuela Azcárate JM, Clau-Terre F, Vicho Pereira R et al (2014) Consensus document on ultrasound training in Intensive Care Medicine. Care process, use of the technique and acquisition of professional skills. Med Intensiva 38:33–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Expert Round Table on Echocardiography in ICU (2014) International consensus statement on training standards for advanced critical care echocardiography. Intensive Care Med 40:654–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Expert Round Table on Ultrasound in ICU (2011) International expert statement on training standards for critical care ultrasonography. Intensive Care Med 37(7):1077–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tonner PH, Bein B, Breitkreutz R et al (2011) DGAI-certified seminar series: anaesthesia focussed echocardiography: module 4 cardiosonography. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 46(11–12):766–770

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Trautner H, Markus CK, Steinhübel B et al (2011) The DGAI training module 2 in anaesthetic focussed sonography: vascular sonography. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 46(11–12):756–759

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Casaroto E (2015) Bedside echocardiography in critically ill patients. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 13(4):644–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kameda T, Taniguchi N (2016) Overview of point-of-care abdominal ultrasound in emergency and critical care. J Intensive Care 4:53

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hempel D, Pfister R, Michels G (2016) Hemodynamic monitoring in intensive care and emergency medicine: integration of clinical signs and ultrasound findings. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 111(7):596–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Werdan K, Ruß M, Buerke M et al (2012) Cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction: diagnosis, monitoring and treatment: a German-Austrian S3 guideline. Dtsch Arztebl Int 109(19):343–351

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A et al (2013) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 39(2):165–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G et al (2014) 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 35(43):3033–3069

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL et al (2016) 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J 37(1):67–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Janssens U, Jung C, Hennersdorf M et al (2016) Empfehlungen zum hämodynamischen Monitoring in der internistischen Intensivmedizin. Kardiologe 10:149–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kanji HD, McCallum JL, Bhagirath KM et al (2016) Curriculum development and evaluation of a hemodynamic critical care ultrasound: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 44(8):e742–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Blumhof S, Wheeler D, Thomas K et al (2016) Change in diaphragmatic thickness during the respiratory cycle predicts extubation success at various levels of pressure support ventilation. Lung 194(4):519–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mayo P, Volpicelli G, Lerolle N et al (2016) Ultrasonography evaluation during the weaning process: the heart, the diaphragm, the pleura and the lung. Intensive Care Med 42(7):1107–1117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schönhofer B, Geiseler J, Dellweg D et al (2014) Prolonged weaning: S2k-guideline published by the German Respiratory Society. Pneumologie 68:19–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik III für Innere Medizin, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland

    G. Michels

  2. Klinik für konservative Intensivmedizin, Dietrich-Bonhoeffer-Klinikum, Neubrandenburg, Deutschland

    H. Zinke

  3. Notfallmedizin der Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    M. Möckel

  4. Klinik für Innere Medizin IV, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland

    D. Hempel

  5. Universitäts-Notfallzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland

    C. Busche &  H.-J. Busch

  6. Klinik für Innere Medizin und Intensivmedizin, St.-Antonius-Hospital, Eschweiler, Deutschland

    U. Janssens

  7. Klinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland

    S. Kluge

  8. Department für Innere Medizin, Internistische Intensivstation, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland

    R. Riessen

  9. Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und internistische Intensivmedizin, St. Marien-Krankenhaus Siegen gem. GmbH, Siegen, Deutschland

    M. Buerke

  10. Klinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie und Angiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland

    M. Kelm

  11. Kardiologie I, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland

    R. S. von Bardeleben

  12. Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie und Angiologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    F. Knebel

Authors
  1. G. Michels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Zinke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Möckel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. Hempel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Busche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. U. Janssens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. S. Kluge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. R. Riessen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. M. Buerke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. M. Kelm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. R. S. von Bardeleben
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. F. Knebel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. H.-J. Busch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Michels.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

G. Michels, H. Zinke, M. Möckel, D. Hempel, C. Busche, U. Janssens, S. Kluge, R. Riessen, M. Buerke, M. Kelm, R.S. von Bardeleben, F. Knebel und H.-J. Busch geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

G. Michels, H. Zinke, U. Janssens, S. Kluge, R. Riessen, M. Buerke und H.-J. Busch repräsentieren stellvertretend die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin e. V. (DGIIN). M. Kelm, R.S. von Bardeleben und F. Knebel repräsentieren stellvertretend die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie e. V. (DGK). M. Möckel und F. Knebel repräsentieren stellvertretend für die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in der Medizin e. V. (DEGUM).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michels, G., Zinke, H., Möckel, M. et al. Empfehlungen zur Ultraschallausbildung in der internistischen Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin: Positionspapier der DGIIN, DEGUM und DGK. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 112, 314–319 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-017-0285-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-017-0285-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation