Skip to main content
Log in

Akuter Myokardinfarkt bei Patienten mit ST-Strecken-Hebungs-Infarkt

ESC-Leitlinien 2017

Acute myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

ESC guidelines 2017

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
Herz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag werden die aktuellen Leitlinien der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (ESC) aus dem Jahr 2017 zur Diagnostik und Therapie des akuten ST-Strecken-Hebungs-Infarkts (STEMI) dargelegt und v. a. die Änderungen im Vergleich zu den früheren STEMI-Leitlinien von 2012 herausgearbeitet. Die primäre perkutane Koronarintervention (PCI) bleibt die bevorzugte Reperfusionstherapie. Veränderungen hinsichtlich der Revaskularisation betreffen v. a. Empfehlungen zur Wahl des radialen Zugangsweges, zur Verwendung von Drug-eluting-Stents anstelle von Bare-metal-Stents sowie zur kompletten Revaskularisation und Vermeidung der Thrombusaspiration. Bei der Begleittherapie während der PCI wurde Bivalirudin herabgestuft. Die Indikation für eine O2-Therapie ist nur noch gegeben bei einer O2-Sättigung von weniger als 90 %. Die intraaortale Ballonpumpe sollte im kardiogenen Schock nicht mehr verwendet werden. Neue Empfehlungen gibt es auch in Bezug auf die Dauer der dualen Antiplättchentherapie für Patienten, bei denen nach den initialen 12 Monaten kein Blutungsereignis aufgetreten ist. Neue überarbeitete Abschnitte betreffen den Myokardinfarkt ohne relevante Koronarstenosen, die Einführung von Qualitätsindikatoren für Herzinfarktnetzwerke und neue Definitionen für die Zeiten bis zur Reperfusion.

Abstract

This article gives an update on the management of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) according to the recently released European Society of Cardiology guidelines 2017 and the modifications are compared to the previous STEMI guidelines from 2012. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains the preferred reperfusion strategy. New guideline recommendations relate to the access site with a clear preference for the radial artery, use of drug-eluting stents over bare metal stents, complete revascularization during the index hospitalization, and avoidance of routine thrombus aspiration. For periprocedural anticoagulation during PCI, bivalirudin has been downgraded. Oxygen treatment should be administered only if oxygen saturation is <90%. In cardiogenic shock, intra-aortic balloon pumps should no longer be used. New recommendations are in place with respect to the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients without bleeding events during the first 12 months. Newly introduced sections cover myocardial infarction with no relevant stenosis of the coronary arteries (MINOCA), the introduction of new indicators for quality of care for myocardial infarction networks and new definitions for the time to reperfusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS et al (2012) Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 33:2551–2567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mcmanus DD, Gore J, Yarzebski J et al (2011) Recent trends in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. Am J Med 124:40–47

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jernberg T (2016) Swedeheart annual report 2015. Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kristensen SD, Laut KG, Fajadet J et al (2014) Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction 2010/2011: current status in 37 ESC countries. Eur Heart J 35:1957–1970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Puymirat E, Simon T, Steeg PG et al (2012) Association of changes in clinical characteristics and management with improvement in survival among patients with st-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA 308:998. https://doi.org/10.1001/2012.jama.11348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gale CP, Allan V, Cattle BA et al (2014) Trends in hospital treatments, including revascularisation, following acute myocardial infarction, 2003–2010: a multilevel and relative survival analysis for the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR). Heart 100:582–589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S et al (2017) 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stub D, Smith K, Bernard S et al (2015) Air versus oxygen in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation 131:2143–2150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hofmann R, James SK, Svensson L et al (2014) DEtermination of the role of OXygen in suspected acute myocardial infarction trial. Am Heart J 167:322–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kubica J, Adamski P, Ostrowska M et al (2016) Morphine delays and attenuates ticagrelor exposure and action in patients with myocardial infarction: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled IMPRESSION trial. Eur Heart J 37:245–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kubica J, Kubica A, Jilma B et al (2016) Impact of morphine on antiplatelet effects of oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Int J Cardiol 215:201–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J et al (2011) Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 377:1409–1420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Carr M et al (2014) Baseline bleeding risk and arterial access site practice in relation to procedural outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:1554–1564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A et al (2012) Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:2481–2489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P et al (2015) Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 385:2465–2476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet J‑P et al (2016) 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 37:267–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sabate M, Cequier A, Iniguez A et al (2012) Everolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (EXAMINATION): 1 year results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 380:1482–1490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sabate M, Brugaletta S, Cequier A et al (2016) Clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with everolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents (EXAMINATION): 5‑year results of a randomised trial. Lancet 387:357–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Raber L, Kelbaek H, Ostojic M et al (2012) Effect of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer vs bare-metal stents on cardiovascular events among patients with acute myocardial infarction: the COMFORTABLE AMI randomized trial. JAMA 308:777–787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bonaa KH, Mannsverk J, Wiseth R et al (2016) Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 375:1242–1252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jolly SS, Cairns JA, Yusuf S et al (2015) Randomized trial of primary PCI with or without routine manual thrombectomy. N Engl J Med 372:1389–1398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Fröbert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK et al (2013) Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 369:1587–1597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thiele H, Desch S, Piek JJ et al (2016) Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous revascularization plus potential staged revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: design and rationale of CULPRIT-SHOCK trial. Am Heart J 172:160–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Smits PC, Abdel-Wahab M, Neumann F‑J et al (2017) Fractional flow reserve-guided multivessel angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 376:1234–1244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gershlick AH, Khan JN, Kelly DJ et al (2015) Randomized trial of complete versus lesion-only revascularization in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI and multivessel disease: the CvLPRIT trial. J Am Coll Card 65:963–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wald DS, Morris JK, Wald NJ et al (2013) Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 369:1115–1123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Engstrom T, Kelbaek H, Helqvist S et al (2015) Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386:665–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. De Waha S, Jobs A, Pöss J et al (2017) Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872617719640

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann F‑J et al (2013) Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Final 12-month results of the randomised IntraAortic Balloon Pump in cardiogenic shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) Trial. Lancet 382:1638–1645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann F‑J et al (2012) Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 367:1287–1296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zeymer U, Hohlfeld T, Vom Dahl J et al (2017) Prospective, randomised trial of the time dependent antiplatelet effects of 500 mg and 250 mg acetylsalicylic acid i. v. and 300 mg p. o. in ACS (ACUTE). Thromb Haemost 117:625–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Montalescot G, Van ’T Hof AW, Lapostolle F et al (2014) Prehospital ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 371:1016–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sarafoff N, Martischnig A, Wealer J et al (2013) Triple therapy with aspirin, prasugrel, and vitamin K antagonists in patients with drug-eluting stent implantation and an indication for oral anticoagulation. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:2060–2066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Valgimigli M, Frigoli E, Leonardi S et al (2015) Bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 373:997–1009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shahzad A, Kemp I, Mars C et al (2014) Unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (HEAT-PPCI): an open-label, single centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 384:1849–1858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Cohen M et al (2015) Long-term use of ticagrelor in patients with prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 372:1791–1800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gibson CM, Mehran R, Bode C et al (2016) Prevention of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI. N Engl J Med 375:2423–2434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dewilde WJ, Oirbans T, Verheugt FW et al (2013) Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 381:1107–1115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pizarro G, Fernández-Friera L, Fuster V et al (2014) Long-term benefit of early pre-reperfusion metoprolol administration in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the METOCARD-CNIC Trial (Effect of Metoprolol in Cardioprotection During an Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 63:2356–2362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ibanez B, Macaya C, Sánchez-Brunete V et al (2013) ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The Effect of Metoprolol in Cardioprotection During an Acute Myocardial Infarction (METOCARD-CNIC) Trial. Circulation 3:1495–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Roolvink V, Ibáñez B, Ottervanger JP et al (2016) Early intravenous beta-blockers in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction before primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 67:2705–2715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Niccoli G, Scalone G, Crea F (2015) Acute myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary atherosclerosis: mechanisms and management. Eur Heart J 36:475–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pasupathy S, Air T, Dreyer RP et al (2015) Systematic review of patients presenting with suspected myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary arteries. Circulation 131:861–870

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Agewall S, Beltrame JF, Reynolds HR et al (2017) ESC working group position paper on myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 38:143–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Thiele.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

H. Thiele, S. Desch und S. de Waha geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thiele, H., Desch, S. & de Waha, S. Akuter Myokardinfarkt bei Patienten mit ST-Strecken-Hebungs-Infarkt. Herz 42, 728–738 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-017-4641-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-017-4641-7

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation