Skip to main content
Log in

Pressure ulcer prevalence rates from 2002 to 2008 in German long-term care facilities

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: Pressure ulcers continue to be an important issue in long-term care facilities. Besides quality initiatives (implementation of guidelines) and increased public awareness of the problem, little is known about the actual extent of the problem in Germany. The aim of this study is to provide information on the magnitude of this problem and to show whether there have been any changes through the years 2002 to 2008. In addition we wanted to know if the results were representative. Methods: 18,706 residents in 218 long-term care facilities (response rate 77.5%). Skin examination of each resident by qualified trained nurses after informed consent was given by resident or proxy. Application of Chi-square tests, chi-square trend tests and one-way ANOVA to assess differences and trends across the years. Comparisons of study samples with data characterizing the potential population. Results: Regarding gender, age, and pressure ulcer risk, the yearly samples were comparable. Pressure ulcer prevalence rates decreased from 12.5% (year 2002) to 5.0% (year 2008) (p<0.001). Prevalence rates, excluding non-blanchable erythema, decreased from 6.6% (year 2002) to 3.5% (year 2008) (p<0.001). Conclusions: Pressure ulcer prevalence in German long-term care facilities decreased from 2002 to 2008. It is highly probable that this decrease was due to more effective strategies and better prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seiler WO, Stahelin HB. [Decubitus ulcers in geriatrics — pathogenesis, prevention and therapy]. Ther Umsch 1991; 48: 329–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooney TC, Reuler JB. Protecting the elderly patient from pressure sores. Geriatrics 1983; 38: 125–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lawrence CA, Silverman M. Skin care of the geriatric patient. A problem in private homes, convalescent homes, and hospitals. Geriatrics 1966; 21: 146–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dharmarajan TS, Ahmed S. The growing problem of pressure ulcers. Evaluation and management for an aging population. Postgrad Med 2003; 113: 77–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mertens EI, Halfens RJ, Dietz E, Scheufele R, Dassen T. Pressure ulcer risk screening in hospitals and nursing homes with a general nursing assessment tool: evaluation of the care dependency scale. J Eval Clin Pract 2008; 14: 1018–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berlowitz DR, Brandeis GH, Anderson J, Du W, Brand H. Effect of pressure ulcers on the survival of long-term care residents. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1997; 52: M106–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Inouye SK, Studenski S, Tinetti ME, Kuchel GA. Geriatric syndromes: clinical, research, and policy implications of a core geriatric concept. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007; 55: 780–91.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Calianno C. Pressure ulcers in acute care: a quality issue. Nurs Manage 2007; 38: 42–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bates-Jensen BM, MacLean CH. Quality indicators for the care of pressure ulcers in vulnerable elders. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007; 55 (Suppl 2): S409–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mukamel DB, Spector WD. Nursing home costs and risk-adjusted outcome measures of quality. Med Care 2000; 38: 78–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Frain R. Decreasing the incidence of heel pressure ulcers in long-term care by increasing awareness: results of a 1-year program. Ostomy Wound Manage 2008; 54: 62–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Capon A, Pavoni N, Mastromattei A, Di Lallo D. Pressure ulcer risk in long-term units: prevalence and associated factors. J Adv Nurs 2007; 58: 263–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vangilder C, Macfarlane GD, Meyer S. Results of nine international pressure ulcer prevalence surveys: 1989 to 2005. Ostomy Wound Manage 2008; 54: 40–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Woodbury MG, Houghton PE. Prevalence of pressure ulcers in Canadian healthcare settings. Ostomy Wound Manage 2004; 50: 22–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaltenthaler E, Whitfield MD, Walters SJ, Akehurst RL, Paisley S. UK, USA and Canada: how do their pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence data compare? J Wound Care 2001; 10: 530–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lynn J, West J, Hausmann S et al. Collaborative clinical quality improvement for pressure ulcers in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007; 55: 1663–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Deutsches Netwerk für Qualitätsentwicklung in der Pflege (Eds.): Expertenstandard Dekubitusprophylaxe in der Pflege (Expert Standard for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers). Osnabrück, 2004.

  18. Wilborn D, Lahmann N, Dassen T. [Comment on the 2nd report of MDS according to 118 abs. 5 SGB XI (“Quality report”): much data, many open questions]. Pflege Z 2008; 61: 6–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Welt-Online. Pflege-Skandal erschüttert Deutschland. In Berlin, Die Welt, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lahmann NA, Halfens RJ, Dassen T. Pressure ulcers in German nursing homes and acute care hospitals: prevalence, frequency, and ulcer characteristics. Ostomy Wound Manage 2006; 52: 20–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bours GJ, Halfens RJ, Lubbers M, Haalboom JR. The development of a national registration form to measure the prevalence of pressure ulcers in The Netherlands. Ostomy Wound Manage 1999; 45: 2, 8–33, 36–8, 40.

    Google Scholar 

  22. German Federal Statistical Office. (Available at: http://www.gbe-bund.de), 2008.

  23. Braden B, Bergstrom N. A conceptual schema for the study of the etiology of pressure sores. Rehabil Nurs 1987; 12: 8–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown SJ. The Braden Scale. A review of the research evidence. Orthop Nurs 2004; 23: 30–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL, Garcia-Fernandez FP, Lopez-Medina IM, Alvarez-Nieto C. Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2006; 54: 94–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kottner J, Dassen T. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes. Int J Nurs Stud 2008; 45: 1501–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The Index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963; 185: 914–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Balzer K, Pohl C, Dassen T, Halfens R. The Norton, Waterlow, Braden, and Care Dependency Scales: comparing their validity when identifying patients’ pressure sore risk. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007; 34: 389–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Maida V, Lau F, Downing M, Yang J. Correlation between Braden Scale and Palliative Performance Scale in advanced illness. Int Wound J 2008; 5: 585–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Leffmann CJ. [Quality management in decubitus prevention]. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2004; 37: 100–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomas DR. Are all pressure ulcers avoidable? J Am Med Dir Assoc 2003; 4: S43–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gunningberg L. Risk, prevalence and prevention of pressure ulcers in three Swedish healthcare settings. J Wound Care 2004; 13: 286–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tannen A, Bours G, Halfens R, Dassen T. A comparison of pressure ulcer prevalence rates in nursing homes in the Netherlands and Germany, adjusted for population characteristics. Res Nurs Health 2006; 29: 588–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tannen A, Dassen T, Halfens R. Differences in prevalence of pressure ulcers between the Netherlands and Germany — associations between risk, prevention and occurrence of pressure ulcers in hospitals and nursing homes. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17: 1237–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nils A. Lahmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lahmann, N.A., Dassen, T., Poehler, A. et al. Pressure ulcer prevalence rates from 2002 to 2008 in German long-term care facilities. Aging Clin Exp Res 22, 152–156 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324789

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324789

Keywords

Navigation