Skip to main content
Log in

The subjective shoulder rating system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We developed a subjective shoulder rating system (SSRS) and tested its reliability against a recognized system (Constant-Murley Score) and a four-point verbal rating scale in 200 patients (mean age 43 years, range 18–71 years; 83 women and 117 men; 48 anterior shoulder reconstructions, 123 subacromial decompressions, 29 manipulations under anesthesia). Within the study period of 1 year, patients completed the SSRS preoperatively and at 1 and 2 weeks, also at 3, 6, and 12 months. The examination according to the Constant-Murley Score was performed preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months. Linear regression showed a highly significant correlation between the SSRS and the Constant-Murley Score (r = 0.83, n = 592, P < 0.001). Ninety-seven percent of the SSRS forms were completed and returned. The average time to complete the SSRS form was 55 s (range 20–310 s) as compared with an experienced examiner requiring an average of 410 s (range 190–720 s) to complete the Constant-Murley Score. The time difference was highly significant (P < 0.001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bigliani LU, Kimmel J, McCann PD, Wolfe J (1992) Repair of rotator cuff tears in tennis players. Am J Sports Med 20:112–117

    Google Scholar 

  2. Constant CR, Murley AHG (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 214:160–164

    Google Scholar 

  3. Flandry F, Hunt JP, Terry GC, Hughston JC (1991) Analysis of subjective knee complaints using visual analog scales. Am J Sports Med 19:112–118

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 51:737–755

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harryman DT, Mack LA, Wang KY, Jackins SE, Richardson ML, Matsen FA (1991) Repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 73:982–989

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huskisson EC (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet 346:1127–1131

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jobe FW, Giangarra CE, Kvitne RS, Glousman RE (1991) Anterior capsulolabral reconstruction of the shoulder in athletes in overhand sports. Am J Sports Med 19:428–434

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johanson NA, Charlson ME, Szatrowski TP, Ranawat CS (1992) A self-administered hip-rating questionnaire for the assessment of outcome after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 74:587–597

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kettelkamp DB, Thompson C (1975) Development of a knee scoring scale. Clin Orthop 107:93–99

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lirette R, Morin F, Kinnard P (1992) The difficulties in assessment of results of anterior acromioplasty. Clin Orthop 278:14–16

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154

    Google Scholar 

  12. Melzack R (1995) The McGill pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1:277–299

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moseley HF (1972) Shoulder lesions, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh; p 28

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neer CS II (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 52:1077–1089

    Google Scholar 

  15. Noyes FR, Mooar LA, Barber SW (1991) The assessment of work-related activities and limitations in knee disorders. Am J Sports Med 19:178–188

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ohnhaus EE, Adler R (1975) Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain 1:379–384

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rowe CR (1988) The shoulder. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 54–63

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating system in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wülker N, Kohn D, Grimm C (1991) Bewertung der Schulterfunktion mit unterschiedlichen Scores. Orthop Praxis 27:750–754

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kohn, D., Geyer, M. The subjective shoulder rating system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116, 324–328 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433982

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433982

Keywords

Navigation