Abstract
Environmental gerontology has adopted a social cohesion perspective on social capital, defining social capital as a neighborhood-level characteristic rather than a property of the individual. This chapter will discuss the macro-micro relationship between social capital and healthy aging by focusing on the relevance of the perceived socio-physical environment in terms of cognitive experiential processes (e.g., urban-related identity) and behavioral processes of engagement in the community (e.g., social participation). We study individuals’ subjective definitions of neighborhood boundaries in geographical space in our attempt to assure a valid mapping of person–environment references. Based on both a phenomenological approach and a comprehensive survey with 595 community-dwelling urban citizens (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) stratified by age (70–79 vs. 80–89 years) and household composition (living alone vs. with partner), a variety of constituents of perceived neighborhood in old age are identified that clearly challenge common notions of what defines a neighborhood as well as point to potential mechanisms of neighboring that have been neglected in most current studies of social capital. On a descriptive level, disparities with respect to aspects of healthy aging, urban-related identity and social participation are investigated across 37 shared perceived neighborhoods using a multi-level approach. Finally, we test the hypothesis that neighborhood-level social capital moderates the effects of place identity and social participation on healthy aging. The consequences of perceived social capital in the neighborhood for agency, belonging, aging in place and, ultimately, for healthy aging in urban neighborhoods are revisited.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Almedom, A. M., & Glandon, D. (2008). Social capital and mental health. In I. Kawachi, S. Subramanian, & D. Kim (Eds.), Social capital and health (pp. 191–214). New York: Springer.
Antonucci, T. C., & Akiyama, H. (1987). Social networks in adult life and a preliminary examination of the convoy model. Journal of Gerontology, 42(5), 519–527.
Baltes, P., & Baltes, M. M. (1993). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. Baltes & M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baltes, M. M., Maas, I., Wilms, H. U., Borchelt, M., & Little, T. (1999). Everyday competence in old and very old age: Theoretical considerations and empirical findings. In P. B. Baltes & K. U. Mayer (Eds.), The Berlin aging study (pp. 384–402). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51(6), 843–857. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4.
Bingenheimer, J. B., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). Statistical and substantive inferences in public health: Issues in the application of multilevel models. Annual Review of Public Health, 5, 53–77. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.050503.153925.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1999). Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. In S. L. Friedman & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), Measuring environment across the life span: Emerging methods and concepts (1st ed., pp. 3–28). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bukov, A. (2008). Soziale Beteiligung im hohen Alter. [Social participation in old age]. Kassel: Kassel University Press.
Cagney, K. A., & Wen, M. (2008). Social capital and aging-related outcomes. In I. Kawachi, S. Subramanian, & D. Kim (Eds.), Social capital and health (pp. 239–258). New York: Springer.
Cagney, K. A., Browning, C. R., & Wen, M. (2005). Racial disparities in self-rated health at older ages: what difference does the neighborhood make? The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(4), 181–190.
Cagney, K. A., Glass, T. A., Skarupski, K. A., Barnes, L. L., Schwartz, B. S., & Mendes de Leon, C. F. (2009). Neighborhood-level cohesion and disorder: Measurement and validation in two older adult urban populations. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64(3), 415–424. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbn041.
Campbell, E., Henly, J. R., Elliott, D. S., & Irwin, K. (2009). Subjective constructions of neighborhood boundaries: Lessons from a qualitative study of four neighborhoods. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(4), 461–490. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00450.x.
Carstensen, L. L. (1991). Selectivity theory: Social activity in life-span context. In K. W. Schaie & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics (Vol. 11, pp. 195–217). New York: Springer.
Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915. (New York). doi:10.1126/science.1127488.
Chaskin, R. J. (1997). Perspectives on neighborhood and community: A review of the literature. The Social Service Review, 71(4), 521–547.
Chaudhury, H., & Mahmood, A. (2008). Immigrants’ residential experience: An overlooked area in environmental design research. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 25(1), 1–5.
Cohen, S., Underwood, L. G., & Gottlieb, B. H. (Eds.). (2000). Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coulton, C. J., Korbin, J., Chan, T., & Su, M. (2001). Mapping residents’ perceptions of neighborhood boundaries: A methodological note. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 371–383. doi:10.1023/A:1010303419034.
Coulton, C., Chan, T., & Mikelbank, K. (2011). Finding place in community change initiatives: Using GIS to uncover resident perceptions of their neighborhoods. Journal of Community Practice, 19(1), 10–28. doi:10.1080/10705422.2011.550258.
Cromley, E. K., Wilson-Genderson, M., & Pruchno, R. A. (2012). Neighborhood characteristics and depressive symptoms of older people: Local spatial analyses. Social Science & Medicine, 75(12), 2307–2316. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.033.
Eschbach, K., Ostir, G. V., Patel, K. V., Markides, K. S., & Goodwin, J. S. (2004). Neighborhood context and mortality among older Mexican Americans: Is there a barrio advantage? American Journal of Public Health, 94(10), 1807–1812.
Evans, G. W., Kantrowitz, E., & Eshelman, P. (2002). Housing quality and psychological well-being among the elderly population. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(4), 381–383. doi:10.1093/geronb/57.4.P381.
Galster, G. (2001). On the nature of neighborhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2111–2124. doi:10.1080/00420980120087072.
Guo, J. Y., & Bhat, C. R. (2007). Operationalizing the concept of neighborhood: Application to residential location choice analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(1), 31–45. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.11.001.
Harpham, T. (2008). The measurement of community social capital through surveys. In I. Kawachi, S. Subramanian, & D. Kim (Eds.), Social capital and health (pp. 51–62). New York: Springer.
Hipp, J. R., Faris, R. W., & Boessen, A. (2012). Measuring ‘neighborhood’: Constructing network neighborhoods. Social Networks, 34(1), 128–140. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.05.002.
Jopp, D., & Leipold, B. (2004). Zur Wahrnehmung von Ressourcen und ihrer Bedeutung für das Wohlbefinden. [Perception of resources and their importance for well-being]. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 37, 354–356. doi:10.1007/s00391-004-0258-6.
Kalbe, E., Kessler, J., Calabrese, P., Smith, R., Passmore, A. P., & Brand, M., et al. (2004). DemTect: A new, sensitive cognitive screening test to support the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and early dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19(2), 136–143. doi:10.1002/gps.1042.
Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S., & Kim, D. (Eds.). (2008). Social capital and health. New York: Springer.
Kusenbach, M. (2008). A hierarchy of urban communities: Observations on the nested character of place. City & Community, 7(3), 225–249. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6040.2008.00259.x.
Lalli, M. (1992). Urban-related identity: Theory, measurement, and empirical findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(4), 285–303. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80078-7.
Lawton, M. P., Moss, M., Hoffman, C., Grant, R., Have, T. T., & Kleban, M. H. (1999). Health, valuation of life, and the wish to live. The Gerontologist, 39(4), 406–416. doi:10.1093/geront/39.4.406.
Lee, H. Y., Jang, S.-N., Lee, S., Cho, S.-I., & Park, E-O. (2008). The relationship between social participation and self-rated health by sex and age: A cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(7), 1042–1054. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.05.007.
Michael, Y. L., Green, M. K., & Farquhar, S. A. (2006). Neighborhood design and active aging. Health & Place, 12(4), 734–740. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.08.002.
Naumann, D. (2006). Gesellschaftliche Integration und Mitwirkung im Kontext des hohen Alters. [Societal integration and participation in the context of old age]. Dissertation, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität, Heidelberg.
Nyqvist, F., Nygård, M., & Jakobsson, G. (2012). Social participation, interpersonal trust, and health: A study of 65- and 75-year-olds in western Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 40(5), 431–438. doi:10.1177/1403494812453887.
Openshaw, S. (1984). The modifiable areal unit problem (CATMOG—Concepts and techniques in modern geography) (Vol. 38). Norwich: Geo Books.
Oswald, F., & Kaspar, R. (2012). On the quantitative assessment of perceived housing in later life. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 26, 72–93. doi:10.1080/02763893.2012.673391.
Oswald, F., & Wahl, H.-W. (2013). Creating and sustaining homelike places in own home environments. In G. D. Rowles & M. Bernard (Eds.), Environmental gerontology: Making meaningful places in old age. New York: Springer.
Oswald, F., Kaspar, R., Frenzel-Erkert, U., Konopik, N. (2013). “Hier will ich wohnen bleiben!” Ergebnisse eines Frankfurter Forschungsprojekts zur Bedeutung des Wohnens in der Nachbarschaft für gesundes Altern. [“Here I want to age in place”. Findings from a Frankfurt research project on meaning of aging in place in the neighborhood for healthy aging]. Frankfurt a. M.: Goethe-Universität Frankfurt und BHF-Bank Stiftung.
Peace, S., Kellaher, L., Holland, C., & ESRC Growing Older Programme. (2006). Environment and identity in later life. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Proshansky, H. M. (1978). The city and self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 10(2), 147–169. doi:10.1177/0013916578102002.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (1999). Ecometrics: Toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with application to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Sociological Methodology, 29, 1–41.
Rowles, G. D. (1983). Geographical dimensions of social support in rural Appalachia. In G. D. Rowles & R. J. Ohta (Eds.), Aging and milieu: Environmental perspectives on growing old (pp. 111–129). New York: Academic.
Rowles, G. D. (2008). Place in occupational science: A life course perspective on the role of environmental context in the quest for meaning. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 127–135. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686622.
Rowles, G. D., & Watkins, J. F. (2003). History, habit, heart and hearth: On making spaces into places. In K. W. Schaie, H.-W. Wahl, H. Mollenkopf, & F. Oswald (Eds.), Aging independently: Living arrangements and mobility (pp. 77–96). New York: Springer.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924. doi:10.1126/science.277.5328.918.
Santos, S. M., Chor, D., & Werneck, G. (2010). Demarcation of local neighborhoods to study relations between contextual factors and health. International Journal of Health Geographics, 9, 34. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-9-34.
Scharf, T., Philippson, C., & Smith, A. (2007). Aging in a difficult place: Assessing the impact of urban deprivation on older people. In H.-W. Wahl, C. Tesch-Römer, & A. Hoff (Eds.), New dynamics in old age: Individual, environmental, and societal perspectives (pp. 153–174, Society and aging series). Amityville: Baywood Publishing Company.
Schnur, O. (2008). Quartiersforschung im Überblick: Konzepte, Definitionen und aktuelle Perspektiven. [Neighborhood research: concepts, definitions, perspectives]. In O. Schnur (Ed.), Quartiersforschung (pp. 19–51). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Schnur, O. (2012). Nachbarschaft und Quartier. In F. Eckardt (Ed.), Handbuch Stadtsoziologie (pp. 449–474). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Sirven, N., & Debrand, T. (2008). Social participation and healthy ageing: An international comparison using SHARE data. Social Science & Medicine, 67(12), 2017–2026. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.056.
Stedman, R. C. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and Behavior, 34(5), 561–581. doi:10.1177/0013916502034005001.
Tuan, Y-F. (1979). Space and place: Humanistic perspective. In S. Gale & G. Olsson (Eds.), Philosophy in geography (pp. 387–427). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Uzzell, D., Pol, E., & Badenas, D. (2002). Place identification, social cohesion, and environmental sustainability. Environment and Behavior, 34(1), 26–53. doi:10.1177/0013916502034001003.
Wahl, H-W., & Oswald, F. (2010). Environmental perspectives on aging. In D. Dannefer & C. Phillipson (Eds.), The sage handbook of social gerontology (pp. 111–124). Los Angeles: Sage.
Wahl, H-W., Iwarsson, S., & Oswald, F. (2012). Aging well and the environment: Toward an integrative model and research agenda for the future. The Gerontologist. doi:10.1093/geront/gnr154.
Ware, J. E. (2002). User’s manual for the SF-12v2 health survey. Lincoln: QualityMetric Inc.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
Weiss, L., Ompad, D., Galea, S., & Vlahov, D. (2007). Defining neighborhood boundaries for urban health research. Understanding the Social Epidemiology of Drug Abuse and HIV/AIDS, 32, 154–159. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.034.
Wellman, B., & Leighton, B. (1979). Networks, neighborhoods, and communities: Approaches to the study of the community question. Urban Affairs Review, 14(3), 363–390. doi:10.1177/107808747901400305.
Wettstein, M., Wahl, H-W., Shoval, N., Oswald, F., Voss, E., Seidl, U., et al. (2012). Out-of-home behavior and cognitive impairment in older adults: Findings of the SenTra project. Journal of Applied Gerontology. doi:10.1177/0733464812459373.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaspar, R., Oswald, F., Hebsaker, J. (2015). Perceived Social Capital in Self-Defined Urban Neighborhoods as a Resource for Healthy Aging. In: Nyqvist, F., Forsman, A. (eds) Social Capital as a Health Resource in Later Life: The Relevance of Context. International Perspectives on Aging, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9615-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9615-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9614-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9615-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)