Editors’ Introduction
We devote the next three chapters to developing an understanding of how leadership traits that were typically viewed as female, now form part of a broader leadership paradigm that is emerging within knowledge economies. This new leadership paradigm is called Complexity Leadership Theory. Though Uhl-Bien and her colleagues do not make specific reference to gender in their earlier papers, it is clear that their work offers important perspectives on the functioning of women within the complex adaptive systems that have come to characterize contemporary organizations. Uhl-Bien (2006:654–676) advances the “entity” perspective on leadership by including a “relational” perspective that describes leadership as socially constructed. This moves us beyond the age of “Great Man Theory” towards an acceptance of leadership as a social change process. Leadership hence becomes more about processes than about individualistic behavior. Uhl-Bien does not stop there however. With colleagues Marion and McKelvey (2007: 298–318), she places the relational perspective within the broader context of complexity leadership theory, and explains how the interplay between different leadership roles, which they refer to as administrative, enabling and adaptive, creates leadership opportunities for both men and women. These three essays form a critical bridge between those essays in this book that emphasize the unique capacities of women, and the broader perspective that these views of female leadership traits are also socially constructed and thus open to revision and change. Relational leadership becomes embedded in a broader leadership theory that allows us to see the traditional archetypes of male and female leadership as modes that emerge, shift and change within the complex dynamics of organizational life. This may allow both men and women to “shift gears”, and not find themselves hemmed in by gender stereotypes.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bradbury, H. and B. Lichtenstein (2000). Relationality in organizational research: Exploring the “space between”. Organization Science 11(5):551–564.
Bryman, A. (2004). Qualitative research on leadership: A critical but appreciative review. The Leadership Quarterly 13(4):397–419.
Bryman, A. (2011). Research methods in the study of leadership. In A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson and M. Uhl-Bien (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Leadership. London: Sage 15–28.
Collinson, D. (2011). Critical leadership studies. In A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson and M. Uhl-Bien (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Leadership. London: Sage 179–193.
Drath, W. (2001). The Deep Blue Sea: Rethinking the Source of Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass and Center for Creative Leadership.
Eisler, R. (1987). The Chalice and the Blade. San Francisco, CA: HarperSanFrancisco.
Fairhurst, G. and D. Grant (2010). The social construction of leadership: A sailing guide. Management Communication Quarterly 24(2):171–210.
Fletcher, J.K. (2004). The paradox of postheroic leadership: An essay on gender, power, and transformational change. The Leadership Quarterly 15:647–661.
Fletcher, J.K. (in press). The relational practice of leadership. In M. Uhl-Bien and S. Ospina (eds.), Advancing Relational Leadership Theory: A Conversation among Perspectives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
Fondas, N. (1997). Feminization unveiled: Management qualities in contemporary writing. Academy of Management Review 22(1):257–282.
Graen, G. (2007). Jessica’s Web: Women’s Advantage in the Knowledge Era. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
Graen, G.B. and M. Uhl-Bien (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly 6:219–247.
Hedström, P. and R. Swedberg (1998). Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heifetz, R.A. (1994). Leadership Without Easy Answers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hosking, D.M. (1988). Organizing, leadership, and skilful process. Journal of Management Studies 25(2):147–166.
Hosking, D.M., Dachler, H.P. and Gergen, K.J. (eds.) (1995). Management and Organization: Relational Alternatives to Individualism. Brookfield, CT: Avebury.
Liden, R.C. and J.M. Maslyn (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management 24:43–72.
Lipman-Blumen, J. (1996). Connective Leadership: Managing in a Changing World. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Meyerson, D.E. and M.A. Scully (1995). Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organization Science 6(5):585–600.
Ospina, S., E. Foldy, W. El Hadidy, J. Dodge, A. Hofmann-Pinilla and C. Su (in press). Social change leadership as relational leadership. In M. Uhl-Bien and S. Ospina (eds.), Advancing Relational Leadership Theory: A Conversation Among Perspectives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
Plowman, D.A. and Smith, A.D. (Forthcoming). The gendering of organizational research methods: Evidence of gender patterns in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Organization & Management.
Regine, B. and R. Lewin (2003). Third possibility leaders: The invisible edge women have in complex organizations. Learning Organization 10(6):347–352.
Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly 17:654–676.
Uhl-Bien, M. and R. Marion (2009). Complexity leadership in bureaucratic forms of organizing: A meso model. The Leadership Quarterly 20:631–650.
Uhl-Bien, M. and R. Marion (2011). Complexity leadership theory. In A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson and M. Uhl-Bien (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Leadership. London: Sage 466–480.
Uhl-Bien, M., R. Marion and B. McKelvey (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly 18(4):298–318.
Uhl-Bien, M. and S. Ospina (in press). Advancing Relational Leadership Theory: A Conversation Among Perspectives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uhl-Bien, M. (2011). Relational Leadership and Gender: From Hierarchy to Relationality. In: Werhane, P., Painter-Morland, M. (eds) Leadership, Gender, and Organization. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9014-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9014-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9013-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9014-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)