Skip to main content

Factors Affecting Fluency in Stutterers when Speaking under Altered Auditory Feedback

  • Chapter

Abstract

If the auditory feedback of a normal speaker is altered, speech control suffers. When, for example, a delay is introduced between when a sound is spoken and when it is heard (delayed auditory feedback, DAF), speech rate decreases and all types of speech error are made. The original explanation of these effects was that speakers normally monitor their auditory feedback in order to check that the speech is being produced correctly. Thus, when auditory feedback is artificially interfered with, speech control suffers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Dewar, A., Dewar, A.W., Austin, W.T.S. & Brash, H.M. (1979). The long-term use of an automatically triggered auditory feedback masking device in the treatment of stammering. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 14, 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fant, G. (1959). Acoustic analysis and synthesis of speech with applications to Swedish. Ericsson Technics, 15, 3–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, E.F. (1942). A study of the relationship between stuttering occurrence and phonetic factors in oral reading. Journal of Speech Disorders, 7, 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, P., Powell, D.J. & Khan, I. (1983). The amplitude contour of the delayed signal and interference in delayed auditory feedback tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 772–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. & Brown, S.F. (1935). Stuttering in relation to various speech sounds. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 21, 481–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, H.L. & Tranel, B. (1971). The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 677–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotzmann, G. (1961). On the use of varied delay times in stammerers. Folia Phoniatrica, 17, 276–310. Sheehan, J.G. (1974). Stuttering behaviour: a phonetic analysis. Journal of Communication Disorders, 7, 193–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I.K. (1966). The properties of stuttered words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behaviour, 5, 112–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Howell, P., El-Yaniv, N., Powell, D.J. (1987). Factors Affecting Fluency in Stutterers when Speaking under Altered Auditory Feedback. In: Peters, H.F.M., Hulstijn, W. (eds) Speech Motor Dynamics in Stuttering. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6969-8_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6969-8_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-7455-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6969-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics