Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 3/2018

31.03.2017 | Original Contribution

Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of an adapted Wolf motor function test for older patients with shoulder injuries

verfasst von: Corinna Oberle, Prof. Clemens Becker, Sabine Schölch, Dr. Joerg-Uwe Lenz, Dr. Stefan Studier-Fischer, Prof. Peter Augat, Lars Schwickert

Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and objective

The Wolf motor function test (WMFT) evaluates the upper extremity performance of patients with neurological disorders and traumatic brain injuries by assessing time and functional capacity. It was later modified to also measure the quality of the performed movements. This study aimed to adapt the WMFT for patients with shoulder injuries and to evaluate the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of this adapted version.

Subjects and methods

A total of 20 individuals with a median age of 80.5 years were assessed using a test-retest design after surgical or conservative treatment of shoulder injuries. Two raters rated performance to determine inter-rater reliability. One rater rated the performance again to determine intra-rater reliability. Both inter-rater and intra-rater agreement were determined by weighted Cohen’s kappa statistics with corresponding confidence intervals. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated to determine internal consistency.

Results

The inter-rater Cohen’s kappa values ranged from 0.84–1.00 for functional capacity and from 0.79–1.00 for quality of movement. For intra-rater reliability the Cohen’s kappa ranged from 0.71–1.00. Cronbach’s alpha was >0.94 for functional capacity and >0.96 for quality of movement.

Conclusion

The adapted version of the WMFT shows high intra-rater and inter-rater reliability for patients with shoulder injuries.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Raschke MJ (2009) Alterstraumatologie: Prophylaxe, Therapie und Rehabilitation. Elsevier, Urban & Fischer, Amsterdam, p 586 Raschke MJ (2009) Alterstraumatologie: Prophylaxe, Therapie und Rehabilitation. Elsevier, Urban & Fischer, Amsterdam, p 586
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zech A et al (2009) Neuromuscular training for rehabilitation of sports injuries: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(10):1831–1841CrossRefPubMed Zech A et al (2009) Neuromuscular training for rehabilitation of sports injuries: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(10):1831–1841CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Franke DS, Ambacher T (2012) Die proximale Humerusfraktur. Obere Extrem 7(3):137–143CrossRef Franke DS, Ambacher T (2012) Die proximale Humerusfraktur. Obere Extrem 7(3):137–143CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Roach KE et al (1991) Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res 4(4):143–149CrossRefPubMed Roach KE et al (1991) Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res 4(4):143–149CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Germann G et al (2003) Standardisierung und Validierung der deutschen Version 2.0 des “Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand” (DASH)-Fragebogens zur Outcome-Messung an der oberen Extremität. Unfallchirurg 106(1):13–19CrossRefPubMed Germann G et al (2003) Standardisierung und Validierung der deutschen Version 2.0 des “Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand” (DASH)-Fragebogens zur Outcome-Messung an der oberen Extremität. Unfallchirurg 106(1):13–19CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dixon D et al (2008) The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) can measure the impairment, activity limitations and participation restriction constructs from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9(1):114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dixon D et al (2008) The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) can measure the impairment, activity limitations and participation restriction constructs from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9(1):114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Boehm D et al (2004) Entwicklung eines Fragebogens basierend auf dem Constant-Murely-Score zur Selbstevaluation der Schulterfunktion durch den Patienten. Unfallchirurg 107(5):397–402CrossRefPubMed Boehm D et al (2004) Entwicklung eines Fragebogens basierend auf dem Constant-Murely-Score zur Selbstevaluation der Schulterfunktion durch den Patienten. Unfallchirurg 107(5):397–402CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Godfrey J (2007) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the simple shoulder test: psychometric properties by age and injury type. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(3):260–267CrossRefPubMed Godfrey J (2007) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the simple shoulder test: psychometric properties by age and injury type. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(3):260–267CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kohn D, Geyer M (1997) The subjective shoulder rating system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116(6–7):324–328CrossRefPubMed Kohn D, Geyer M (1997) The subjective shoulder rating system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116(6–7):324–328CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Richards RR et al (1987) A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 3(6):347–352CrossRef Richards RR et al (1987) A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 3(6):347–352CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 214:160–164 Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 214:160–164
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Conboy VB et al (1996) An evaluation of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(2):229–232CrossRefPubMed Conboy VB et al (1996) An evaluation of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(2):229–232CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris DM et al (2001) The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82(6):750–755CrossRefPubMed Morris DM et al (2001) The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82(6):750–755CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bauder H, Taub E, Miltner WHR (2001) Behandlung motorischer Störungen nach Schlaganfall. Die Taubsche Bewegungsinduktionstherapie. Hogrefe, Göttingen Bauder H, Taub E, Miltner WHR (2001) Behandlung motorischer Störungen nach Schlaganfall. Die Taubsche Bewegungsinduktionstherapie. Hogrefe, Göttingen
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwickert L et al (2011) Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of proximal humerus fractures in virtual environments: a pilot study. Z Gerontol Geriatr 44(6):387–392CrossRefPubMed Schwickert L et al (2011) Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of proximal humerus fractures in virtual environments: a pilot study. Z Gerontol Geriatr 44(6):387–392CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fried LP et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(3):146–156CrossRef Fried LP et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(3):146–156CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Placzek JD et al (2004) Shoulder outcome measures: a comparison of 6 functional tests. Am J Sports Med 32(5):1270–1277CrossRefPubMed Placzek JD et al (2004) Shoulder outcome measures: a comparison of 6 functional tests. Am J Sports Med 32(5):1270–1277CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bohannon RW (2006) Reference values for adult grip strength measured with a Jamar dynamometer: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy 92(1):11–15CrossRef Bohannon RW (2006) Reference values for adult grip strength measured with a Jamar dynamometer: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy 92(1):11–15CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitall J (2006) Psychometric properties of a modified Wolf Motor Function test for people with mild and moderate upper-extremity hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87(5):656–660CrossRefPubMed Whitall J (2006) Psychometric properties of a modified Wolf Motor Function test for people with mild and moderate upper-extremity hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87(5):656–660CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70(4):213–220CrossRefPubMed Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70(4):213–220CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37(5):360–363PubMed Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37(5):360–363PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Pereira ND et al (2011) Reliability of the Brazilian version of the Wolf Motor Function Test in adults with hemiparesis. Rev Bras Fisioter 15(3):257–265CrossRefPubMed Pereira ND et al (2011) Reliability of the Brazilian version of the Wolf Motor Function Test in adults with hemiparesis. Rev Bras Fisioter 15(3):257–265CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Nijland R et al (2010) A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: the Wolf Motor Function Test and the Action Research Arm Test. J Rehabil Med 42(7):694–696CrossRefPubMed Nijland R et al (2010) A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: the Wolf Motor Function Test and the Action Research Arm Test. J Rehabil Med 42(7):694–696CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat George D (2005) PSS for Windows step-by-step: a simple guide and reference, 13.0 update, 6th edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, p 400 George D (2005) PSS for Windows step-by-step: a simple guide and reference, 13.0 update, 6th edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, p 400
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu C et al (2011) Assessing the streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test as an outcome measure for stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25(2):194–199CrossRefPubMed Wu C et al (2011) Assessing the streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test as an outcome measure for stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25(2):194–199CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Taub E, Morris DM, Crago J (2011) Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Manual. Birmingham: University of Alabama, CI Therapy Research Group Taub E, Morris DM, Crago J (2011) Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Manual. Birmingham: University of Alabama, CI Therapy Research Group
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Gallo JJ (2006) Handbook of geriatric assessment, 4th edn. Jones & Bartlett, Sudbury, p 475 Gallo JJ (2006) Handbook of geriatric assessment, 4th edn. Jones & Bartlett, Sudbury, p 475
Metadaten
Titel
Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of an adapted Wolf motor function test for older patients with shoulder injuries
verfasst von
Corinna Oberle
Prof. Clemens Becker
Sabine Schölch
Dr. Joerg-Uwe Lenz
Dr. Stefan Studier-Fischer
Prof. Peter Augat
Lars Schwickert
Publikationsdatum
31.03.2017
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0948-6704
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-1269
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-017-1226-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Mitteilungen des BV Geriatrie

Mitteilungen des BV Geriatrie

Mitteilungen der DGGG

Mitteilungen der DGGG

Journal Club

Journal Club