Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-018-1374-z) contains supplementary material, among others the complete German translation, which is available to authorized users.
Tools to detect subtle balance deficits in high-functioning community-dwelling older adults are lacking. The Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CBM) is a valuable tool to measure balance deficits in this group; however, it is not yet available in the German language.
The aim was 1) to translate and cross-culturally adapt the CBM into the German language and 2) to investigate the measurement properties of the German CBM (G-CBM).
The original CBM was translated into the German language according to established guidelines. A total of 51 older adults (mean age 69.9 ± 7.1 years) were recruited to measure construct validity by comparing the G‑CBM against standardized balance and/or mobility assessments including the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (FAB), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), 3 m Tandem Walk (3MTW), 8 Level Balance Scale (8LBS), 30 s Chair Stand Test (30CST), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, gait speed, and the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). Intrarater and interrater reliability and internal consistency reliability were estimated using intraclass correlations (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. Ceiling effects were calculated as the percentage of the sample scoring the maximum score.
The G‑CBM correlated excellently with FAB and BBS (ρ = 0.78–0.85; P < 0.001), good with 3MTW, TUG, and FES-I (ρ = −0.55 to −0.61; P < 0.001), and moderately with 8LBS, 30CST, and habitual gait speed (ρ = 0.32–0.46; P < 0.001). Intrarater (ICC3,k = 0.998; P < 0.001) and interrater (ICC2,k = 0.996; P < 0.001) reliability, and internal consistency reliability (α = 0.998) were also high. The G‑CBM did not show ceiling effects.
The G‑CBM is a valid and reliable tool for measuring subtle balance deficits in older high-functioning adults. The absence of ceiling effects emphasizes the use of this scale in this cohort. The G‑CBM can now be utilized in clinical practice.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F et al (2002) Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of health status measures. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, New York, pp 1–9
Berg K, Wood-Dauphine S, Williams J et al (1989) Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can 41:304–311 CrossRef
Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ et al (1998) Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess (Rockv) 2:i–iv (1–74)
Li F, Mcauley E, Fisher KJ et al (2002) Self-efficacy as a mediator between fear of falling and functional ability in the elderly. J Aging Health 14:452–466 CrossRef
Lundin-Olsson L (2010) Community-dwelling older adults with balance impairment show a moderate increase in fall risk, although further research is required to refine how balance measurement can be used in clinical practice. Evid Based Nurs 13(3):96. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebn1078 CrossRefPubMed
Mcauley E, Mihalko SL, Rosengren K (1997) Self-efficacy and balance correlates of fear of falling in the elderly. J Aging Phys Act 5:329–340 CrossRef
Nunnally J (1994) Bernstein. Psychometric Theory, New York
Portney LG, Watkins MP (2000) Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Scherfer E, Bohls C, Freiberger E et al (2006) Berg-Balance-Scale. Physioscience 2:59–66 CrossRef
Whitney SL, Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF et al (2005) Clinical measurement of sit-to-stand performance in people with balance disorders: validity of data for the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test. Phys Ther 85:1034–1045 PubMed
German version of the Community Balance and Mobility Scale
Translation and evaluation of measurement properties
A. Stefanie Mikolaizak
- Springer Medizin
Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie
Print ISSN: 0948-6704
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-1269