Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-018-1453-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
An increasing number of persons continue to work after retirement age. This decision is often different between men and women as well as working histories, sectors and hierarchical positions; however, whether gender differences in working conditions and occupational well-being also exist in paid employment after retirement (PEAR) has not yet been investigated.
This study aimed to examine gender differences in working conditions and well-being of workers in PEAR.
In this study 784 employees (23.5% female) aged 65 years and older who were contracted by a Dutch temporary employment agency, participated in the baseline survey in 2011. Furthermore, a panel of 228 employees (25.9% female) participated again during a second wave in 2012. Job demands, job control, emotional exhaustion and job engagement were assessed at both time points by validated self-reporting measures.
Female employees worked fewer years in paid employment before 65 years of age, were more likely to be single, divorced or widowed, had a smaller income and worked less hours during PEAR than men. In the baseline analysis, females reported less job control and higher job stress than men. No gender differences were found on emotional exhaustion, engagement or job demands. Over the study period emotional exhaustion only increased in females. The longitudinal trend of job demands, control and engagement did not significantly differ between both sexes.
The results suggest that working conditions of PEAR are less favorable for women than for men. Furthermore, the longitudinal trend of emotional exhaustion seems to be more disadvantageous for women.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Supplemental Material 1 Drop-out analysis for all participants, male participants and female participants with data from wave 1391_2018_1453_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Supplemental Material 2 Spearman correlation between study variables391_2018_1453_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Supplemental Material 3 Results of repeated measures ANCOVA391_2018_1453_MOESM3_ESM.pdf
Ahlin JK, Westerlund H, Griep Y, Magnusson Hanson LL (2018) Trajectories of job demands and control: risk for subsequent symptoms of major depression in the nationally representative Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health (SLOSH). Int Arch Occup Environ Health 91:263–272 CrossRef
Ardito C, d’Errico A, Leombruni R (2014) Exposure to psychosocial factors at work and mental well-being in Europe. Med Lav 105:85–99
Beehr TA, Bennett MM (2014) Working After Retirement: Features of Bridge Employment and Research Directions. Work Aging Retire 1:112–128 CrossRef
Bijlsma I, Fouarge D, Montizaan R (2017) Werken met een AOW. Omvang, beweegredenen en risico’s van verdringing. Netspar Ind Pap Ser 69:1–57 (opinion paper)
Bosma H, Marmot MG, Hemingway H, Nicholson AC, Brunner E, Stansfeld SA (1997) Low job control and risk of coronary heart disease in Whitehall II (prospective cohort) study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 314:558–565 CrossRef
Campos-Serna J, Ronda-Perez E, Artazcoz L, Moen BE, Benavides FG (2013) Gender inequalities in occupational health related to the unequal distribution of working and employment conditions: a systematic review. Int J Equity Health 12:57 CrossRef
Couper MP, Kapteyn A, Schonlau M, Winter J (2007) Noncoverage and nonresponse in an Internet survey. Soc Sci Res 36:131–148 CrossRef
Finch N (2014) Why are women more likely than men to extend paid work? The impact of work–family life history. Eur J Ageing 11:31–39 CrossRef
Ganzeboom HBG, De Graaf PM, Treiman DJ (1992) A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Soc Sci Res 21:1–56 CrossRef
Hedge JW, Borman WC (2012) The Oxford handbook of work and aging. Oxford University Press, New York
Henkens K, Leenders M (2010) Burnout and older workers’ intentions to retire. Int J Manpow 31:306–321 CrossRef
Henkens K, Van Solinge H (2014) Bridge employment in the Netherlands: who, what and why? In: Bridge employment: a research handbook. Routledge, New York, pp 27–50
Hofäcker D, Naumann E (2015) The emerging trend of work beyond retirement age in Germany. Z Gerontol Geriatr 48:473–479 CrossRef
Horn JE, Taris TW, Schaufeli WB, Schreurs PJ (2010) The structure of occupational well-being: a study among Dutch teachers. J Occup Organ Psychol 77:365–375 CrossRef
Karasek RA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q 24:285–308 CrossRef
Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B (1998) The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol 3:322–355 CrossRef
Lange AH de, Taris TW, Kompier MA, Houtman IL, Bongers PM (2003) “The very best of the millennium”: longitudinal research and the demand-control-(support) model. J Occup Health Psychol 8:282–305 CrossRef
Larsen M (2008) Does quality of work life affect men and women’s retirement planning differently? Appl Res Qual Life 3:23–42 CrossRef
Mäkikangas A, Kinnunen U, Feldt T, Schaufeli W (2016) The longitudinal development of employee well-being: a systematic review. Work Stress 30:46–70 CrossRef
Melamed S, Shirom A, Toker S, Berliner S, Shapira I (2006) Burnout and risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence, possible causal paths, and promising research directions. Psychol Bull 132:327–353 CrossRef
Micheel F, Roloff J, Wickenheiser I (2011) The impact of socioeconomic characteristics on older employees’ willingness to continue working in retirement Age. Comp Popul Stud 35:833–868
Muhonen T, Torkelson E (2003) The demand-control-support model and health among women and men in similar occupations. J Behav Med 26:601–613 CrossRef
Müller A, De Lange A, Weigl M, Van der Heijden B, Ackermans J, Wilkenloh J (2015) Task performance among employees above age 65: the role of cognitive functioning and job demand-control. Work Aging Retire 1:296–308 CrossRef
Niedhammer I, Sultan-Taieb H, Chastang JF, Vermeylen G, Parent-Thirion A (2012) Exposure to psychosocial work factors in 31 European countries. Occup Med (Lond) 62:196–202 CrossRef
Purvanova RK, Muros JP (2010) Gender differences in burnout: a meta-analysis. J Vocat Behav 77:168–185 CrossRef
Schaufeli WB, Van Dierendonck D (1993) The construct validity of two burnout measures. J Organ Behav 14:631–647 CrossRef
Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Maslach C, Jackson SE (1996) Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS). In: Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP (eds) Maslach Burnout Iventory Manua, 3rd edn. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto
Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-Romá V, Bakker AB (2002) The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness Stud 3:71–92 CrossRef
Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M (2006) The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. Educ Psychol Meas 66:701–716 CrossRef
Sekine M, Tatsuse T, Kagamimori S, Chandola T, Cable N, Marmot M, Martikainen P, Lallukka T, Rahkonen O, Lahelma E (2011) Sex inequalities in physical and mental functioning of British, Finnish, and Japanese civil servants: role of job demand, control and work hours. Soc Sci Med 73:595–603 CrossRef
Smith B, Smith TC, Gray GC, Ryan MA (2007) When epidemiology meets the Internet: web-based surveys in the Millennium Cohort Study. Am J Epidemiol 166:1345–1354 CrossRef
Verhofstadt E, Baillien E, Verhaest D, De Witte H (2017) On the moderating role of years of work experience in the Job Demand–Control model. Econ Ind Democr 38:294–313 CrossRef
Wang M, Zhan Y, Liu S, Shultz KS (2008) Antecedents of bridge employment: a longitudinal investigation. J Appl Psychol 93:818–830 CrossRef
Gender differences in paid employment after retirement
Psychosocial working conditions and well-being
Annet de Lange
- Springer Medizin