Zum Inhalt

Effect of nurse leadership on national survey and evaluation of inpatient satisfaction: a single-center correlation study

  • Open Access
  • 11.02.2026
  • Research
Erschienen in:

Abstract

Background and objective

Recently, the concept of nurse leadership has been expanded from managerial duties and styles to the essential abilities of frontline nurses for inspiring patients. Nevertheless, limited studies have reported the correlation between frontline nurse leadership and patient satisfaction. This study aims to investigate the association between nursing leadership and the National Health Commission Inpatient Satisfaction Survey and Evaluation (NHC-ISSE) to provide empirical evidence for enhancing patient satisfaction and nursing practice.

Methods

A total of 108 nurses currently on duty were enrolled in this single-center cross-sectional study and surveyed using the Nurse Leadership Questionnaire (NLQ). Concurrently, all 329 patients under their care (ranging from 2 to 4 patients per nurse) were included in the NHC-ISSE survey. Pearson correlation and multivariate partial correlation were used to analyze the relationship between nurse leadership and patient satisfaction.

Results

The NLQ returned 108/108 questionnaires with a 100% response rate and 198.87 ± 29.31 average score; the NHC-ISSE returned 317/329 questionnaires with a 96.4% response rate and 38.98 ± 3.07 average score. There were positive correlations between the total and dimension scores of the two scales (r = 0.292 to 0.795, all P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed significant partial correlations between nurse communication skills (rpartial=0.193, P = 0.048), problem-solving ability (rpartial=0.244, P = 0.014), and nursing expertise (rpartial=0.307, P = 0.002) in relation to the NHC-ISSE scores. Meanwhile, the NLQ scores were significantly associated with patient satisfaction on nurse-patient communication (rpartail=0.445, P < 0.001), medication management (rpartail=0.244, P = 0.012), and nursing expertise (rpartail=0.324, P = 0.001).

Conclusion

The seven essential competencies encompassed in the NLQ scale are positively associated with inpatient satisfaction, especially nurses’ communication skills, problem-solving skills, and nursing expertise. Enhancing nursing leadership may contribute to improving the patient experience and satisfaction. It is recommended to launch quality improvement initiatives to monitor the impact of nurse leadership on patient outcomes.
Mengqin Dai and Yun Qiu contributed equally to this work.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Nursing constitutes an essential element of contemporary healthcare and plays a crucial role in the current patient-centered healthcare framework [13]. At present, the advancement of industrialization and urbanization, coupled with an aging population, and environmental and lifestyle changes, has led to a rise in chronic diseases, mental disorders, and major communicable diseases as increasingly prominent public health concerns [4]. So, the general public imposes greater demands on both the quantity and quality of nursing services [5]. Consequently, the nurse role has progressed beyond conventional positioning, with growing prominence on spearheading medical system reform, advocating for interdisciplinary collaboration, and actively engaging in policy-making [68]. As the cornerstone of healthcare, clinical nurses not only ensure the smooth process of medical procedures and fulfill patient needs [9, 10], but also engage in close interactions with patients and their families across diverse healthcare settings [11, 12].
Nursing leadership refers to the ability of clinical nurses to organize and plan the delivery of safe and effective nursing practice activities and serves as a crucial determinant in improving quality and patient outcomes [12, 13]. The current understanding of nursing leadership emphasizes the capacity to inspire patients and their families, the nursing team, and the whole organization. Some reports have emphasized the necessity for general nursing professionals to cultivate nursing leadership [14, 15]. Increasing hospital managers focus on the cultivation of nursing leadership in frontline nurses, and a few studies have shifted their attention from nursing managers to clinical nurses to assess the impact of nursing leadership on nursing quality [1618]. It has been reported that the nursing leadership among clinical nurses is gradually improving, potentially resulting in a positive influence on facilitating nurse performance, providing quality care, and ensuring patient safety [19, 20].
Patient satisfaction plays a crucial role in assessing the quality of medical services and constitutes an essential component of the performance evaluation framework for tertiary public hospitals in China [21]. The clinical nursing staff at the frontline have the most frequent and prolonged contact with patients, thereby exerting a certain influence on patient evaluation of medical services [22]. However, current domestic and international studies on nursing leadership have primarily focused on nursing managers [12], with little attention paid to frontline nurses working in clinical settings. As the concept of nursing leadership extends to the essential abilities required in nurse-patient interactions, there are conflicting reports regarding the correlation between nursing leadership and patient satisfaction [23, 24]. Therefore, this study investigated the current status of nursing leadership in frontline nurses and explored its correlation with the national survey of inpatient satisfaction, aiming to provide evidence to cultivate nursing leadership of frontline nurses, and further improve patient satisfaction.

Methods

This study was conducted under the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013) and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (Approval No.: S20230345-01, Date: Aug. 21, 2023). All participants signed informed consent.

Participants

Given that the leadership has not yet achieved widespread acceptance among frontline nurses, the sample size was calculated in accordance with statistical requirements for correlation analysis between frontline nurse leadership and patient overall satisfaction. In the correlation analysis module of the PASS software, with a significance level α set at 0.05, statistical power (1 − β) at 0.9, a null correlation coefficient of 0.1, and an expected correlation coefficient of 0.5, the minimum required sample size was determined to be 108.
During October 2023 to December 2023, this study recruited 108 nurses and 329 patients who were under their care from Mianyang Central Hospital, affiliated to School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China. The nurses were selected through convenience sampling according to the voluntariness of frontline nurses, and all patients receiving care from these nurses at this time were included. The inclusion criteria for nurses were as follows: (1) possession of a valid nursing license; (2) minimum clinical nursing experience of one year; and (3) voluntary participation with signed informed consent. The exclusion criteria for nurses were as follows: (1) standardized training nurses (recent graduates in a two-year formal standardized training program in our hospital), trainee student nurses, and visiting nurses on extended study from external institutions; (2) nurse managers and other non-bedside nurses; and (3) nurses on long-term leave due to illness, childbirth, or other reasons. The inclusion criteria for patients were as follows: (1) hospital stay of at least 3 days; (2) being in stable conditions; and (3) with independent expression ability. The exclusion criteria for patients were as follows: (1) critically ill or in a near-death state; (2) diagnosed with mental and infectious diseases; (3) declined participation in the survey.

Questionnaires

Two general information questionnaires were designed for the nurses and patients, respectively. The nurse general information questionnaire includes gender, age, education, job title, work experience, marital status, and employment status; and the patient general information questionnaire includes gender, age, marital status, education, and monthly income.
The Nurse Leadership Questionnaire (NLQ) was developed by Hangzhou Normal University in China [25]. This questionnaire comprises 7 dimensions with a total of 46 items. Its dimensions (items) include interpersonal skill (8 items), communication skill (6 items), critical thinking ability (5 items), problem-solving ability (5 items), planning and organizing ability (7 items), nursing expertise (9 items), and self-protection ability (6 items). Each item employs a Likert 5-point scale, ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree” with scores from 1 to 5. Its content validity coefficient (CVL) is 0.883. Its Cronbach’s α coefficient is 0.947, with each dimension ranging from 0.746 to 0.810. The mean scores below 2, ranging from 2 to 3, ranging from 3 to 4, and above 4 were defined as poor, lower, middle, and upper levels of nurse leadership, respectively.
The original National Health Commission inpatient satisfaction survey and evaluation (NHC-ISSE) is available at http://www.gydey.cn/statics/ad/20190912/ad2090912.html. The questionnaire related to nurses includes 7 dimensions with a total of 10 items, including patient satisfaction with nurse-patient communication (4 items), pain management (1 item), medication guidance (3 items), caregiver management (1 item), and discharge instruction (1 item). Each item employs a Likert 4-point scale, ranging from “never”, “sometimes”, “often”, and “always” with scores from 1 to 4, respectively. As each nurse was responsible for managing 2–4 patients, the final score was determined by averaging the NHC-ISSE scores. This approach ensured a one-to-one correspondence between the NHC-ISSE and NLQ scores. The mean scores below 3, ranging from 3 to 3.5, and above 3.5 were defined as low, moderate, and high levels of satisfaction, respectively.

Quality control of investigation process

Following the approval from the Nursing Department and the Ethical Committee in our hospital, a survey team comprising researchers and clinical ward nurse leaders was formed to conduct the investigation, guide questionnaire completion, and collect data. The researchers conducted training for the nurse leaders to standardize their guidance language. The questionnaires were developed using Questionnaire Star, with an explanation of the purpose, significance, and methodology provided on the guidance page for respondents. Participation in the survey required respondents to sign an informed consent form on this guidance page before continuing. The nurse leaders distributed two-dimensional QR codes linked to the digital questionnaire to eligible participants and offered assistance as needed. Respondents completed the NLQ questionnaire within 10 to 20 min anonymously and independently; each IP address was restricted to a single submission.
The NHC-ISSE survey was administered after patient discharge. Researchers contacted patients by telephone and instructed them to log in to the hospital’s WeChat official account using their medical record number, then completed the NHC-ISSE questionnaire via the provided link. Each medical record number was restricted to a single submission to ensure data integrity.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the data was conducted using SPSS version 26.0. The categorical data were presented as counts and percentages. The normally distributed metric data were reported as means and standard deviations, and difference comparisons were conducted using independent sample t-tests (if two-grouping), or one-way ANOVA (if multi-grouping), followed by LSD-t tests (for pairwise comparisons). The Pearson correlation analysis was employed to test the bivariate correlation between the NLQ and NHC-ISSE scales, as well as their dimension scores. If |r| falls into less than 0.200, between 0.200 and 0.399, between 0.400 and 0.599, between 0.600 and 0.799, and greater than or equal to 0.800, it represents no, mild, moderate, strong, and extremely strong correlation, respectively. The multivariate partial correlation analysis was employed to analyze the influencing degree of each dimension in the NLQ scale on patient satisfaction, as well as the close degree of each dimension in the NHC-ISSE scale with nursing leadership. The significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Demographic information of the participants

A total of 108 nurses and 329 patients were given questionnaires. 108 NLQ questionnaires were returned, with a 100% response rate. Due to the declined participation of 12 patients, 317 NHC-ISSE questionnaires were returned, with a 96.4% response rate. The demographic information of the participants is shown in Table 1.
Table 1
The demographic information of the participants
Nurse
Item
n (%)
Patient
Item
n (%)
Gender
Male
0(0.0)
Gender
Male
138(43.5)
 
Female
108(100.0)
 
Female
179(56.5)
Age
≤ 25 years
7(6.4)
Age
< 30 years
63(19.9)
 
26–35 years
53(49.1)
 
30–45 years
70(22.1)
 
36–45 years
37(34.3)
 
46–60 years
81(25.5)
 
> 45 years
11(10.2)
 
> 60years
103(32.5)
Job title
Junior title
33(30.6)
Department of admission
Medicine
97(30.6)
 
Intermediate title
66(61.1)
 
Surgery
179(56.5)
 
Advanced title
9(8.3)
 
Other
41(12.9)
Education
Junior college or below
12(11.1)
Education
Junior college or below
240(75.7)
 
Undergraduate
95(88.0)
 
Undergraduate
77(24.3)
 
Postgraduate
1(0.9)
 
Postgraduate
0(0.0)
Work experience
1-5years
16(14.8)
Monthly income
≤ 1000 RMB
58(18.3)
 
5-10years
29(26.8)
 
1000–3000 RMB
111(35.0)
 
10-20years
48(44.5)
 
3000–5000 RMB
77(24.3)
 
Above20years
15(13.9)
 
Above 5000 RMB
71(22.4)
Marital status
Unmarried
23(21.3)
Marital status
Unmarried
189(59.6)
 
Married
82(75.9)
 
Married
90(28.4)
 
Divorce
3(2.8)
 
Divorce
38(12.0)
Employment status
On regular payroll
26(24.1)
Whether first admission
Yes
129(40.7)
 
Under contract
82(75.9)
 
No
188(59.3)
Note: Junior title refers to the professional title of nurse or nurse practitioner; Intermediate title refers to the professional title of nurse in charge; Advanced title refers to the professional title of associate senior nurse or full senior nurse

NLQ and NHC-ISSE scores

The NHC-ISSE final score for individual nurses was computed as the average score of 2 to 4 patients under their care. The average scores of the NLQ and NHC-ISSE scales were 198.87 ± 29.31 and 38.98 ± 3.07, respectively (Shown in Table 2). Further grouping by the nurse demographic information, the post-hoc test of variance analysis only revealed a significant difference in self-protection ability between the junior and intermediate titles (LSD-t=-2.038, P = 0.023). Other than that, the NLQ overall score and its other dimension scores did not differ significantly across different ages, education levels, work experiences, marital status, and employment status (all P > 0.05). Furthermore, there is also no difference in the NHC-ISSE overall score and its dimension scores across different ages, education levels, professional titles, work experiences, marital status, and employment status (all P > 0.05).
Table 2
The scores for NLQ and NHC-ISSE (Mean ± SD)
Questionnaire and dimension
Item number
Overall Score
Item Average Score
NLQ scale
46
198.87 ± 29.31
4.32 ± 0.64
 Interpersonal skill
8
34.16 ± 5.49
4.26 ± 0.69
 Communication skill
6
26.18 ± 4.13
4.36 ± 0.69
 Critical thinking ability
5
22.31 ± 3.36
4.46 ± 0.67
 Problem-solving ability
5
21.66 ± 3.46
4.33 ± 0.69
 Planning and organizing ability
7
30.06 ± 5.22
4.29 ± 0.75
 Nursing expertise
9
39.81 ± 5.79
4.42 ± 0.64
 Self-protection ability
6
24.71 ± 4.65
4.11 ± 0.78
NHC-ISSE scale
10
38.98 ± 3.07
3.89 ± 0.31
 Communication satisfaction
4
15.53 ± 1.55
3.88 ± 0.39
 Pain management satisfaction
1
3.90 ± 0.39
3.89 ± 0.39
 Medication guidance satisfaction
3
11.70 ± 1.13
3.90 ± 0.38
 Caregiver management satisfaction
1
3.91 ± 0.29
3.91 ± 0.29
 Discharge instruction satisfaction
1
3.94 ± 0.23
3.94 ± 0.23

Bivariate correlation analysis of NLQ and NHC-ISSE scales and their dimensions

Pearson correlation analysis revealed a strong to extremely strong correlation between the NLQ overall score and its dimension scores (r = 0.702 ~ 0.945, all P < 0.001), while a mild to extremely strong correlation between the NLC-ISSE score and its dimension scores (r = 0.240 ~ 0.924, all P < 0.001) (Shown in Fig. 1). Between the two scales, the overall and dimension scores showed a mild to strong correlation (r = 0.292 ~ 0.795, all P < 0.001).
Fig. 1
Bivariate correlation heatmap of two scale and its dimensions. Note: From red to green to blue, r varies from 1.0 to 0 to -1.0. The results revealed a mild to strong Pearson correlation between NLQ and NLC-ISSE scales (P < 0.001)
Bild vergrößern

Forward and reverse independent association analysis of NLQ affected on NHC-ISSE

The role of nursing leadership in patient satisfaction was assumed to be forward association. Forward analysis showed that the NLQ overall score was closely correlated to the patient satisfaction with communication, medication guidance, and caregiver management of the NHC-ISSE scale (rpartail=0.445, 0.244, and 0.324, P = < 0.001, 0.012, and 0.001). Reverse analysis showed that the NHC-ISSE overall score was closely correlated with the communication skill, problem-solving ability, and nursing expertise of the NLQ scale (rpartail=0.193, 0.244, and 0.307, P = 0.048, 0.014, and 0.002) (Shown in Table 3).
Table 3
Independent correlation between nurse leadership and patient satisfaction
Item
Beta
SE
rpartial
t
P
NLQ score
     
 Communication satisfaction
8.658
1.725
0.445
5.018
< 0.001
 Pain management satisfaction
10.164
10.423
0.096
0.975
0.332
 Medication guidance satisfaction
6.238
2.431
0.244
2.566
0.012
 Caregiver management satisfaction
23.256
6.660
0.324
3.492
0.001
 Discharge instruction satisfaction
7.681
11.660
0.065
0.659
0.512
NHC-ISSE score
     
 Interpersonal skill
-0.002
0.062
-0.003
-0.028
0.977
 Communication skill
0.159
0.079
0.193
2.001
0.048
 Critical thinking ability
0.413
0.164
0.244
2.514
0.014
 Problem-solving ability
-0.209
0.147
-0.140
-1.419
0.159
 Planning and organizing ability
-0.071
0.093
-0.076
-0.761
0.449
 Nursing expertise
0.256
0.079
0.307
3.232
0.002
 Self-protection ability
0.044
0.062
0.071
0.714
0.477

Discussion

With the reform and advancement of the healthcare cause, nurses play a pivotal role within the medical framework. They are essential members of the healthcare team, custodians of medical quality and safety, and facilitators of seamless operations within the medical system [26, 27]. They contact patients directly in most medical services, and their responsibilities encompass executing physicians’ orders, monitoring patient conditions, and delivering health education, etc [28]. In various interactions with patients, their skills and competencies may potentially influence nursing quality and safety. This study suggests a close link between the leadership competencies of frontline nurses and patient satisfaction across various interactive dimensions. Specifically, the effective communication skills, problem-solving abilities, and nursing expertise assessed by the NLQ scale are identified as independent influential factors that significantly impact overall patient satisfaction, particularly about nurse-patient communication, pain management, and caregiver management satisfaction.
In 2007, Chinese scholars introduced the concept of nursing-team leadership competency, distinguishing it from manager leadership competency and highlighting the importance of fostering leadership competencies among frontline nurses [29]. Scholar Bard et al. proposed a novel interpretation of nursing leadership, defined as the capacity to anticipate developments in a rapidly evolving healthcare landscape, proactively address crises and challenges, and make meaningful contributions to global health [30, 31]. Thus, nursing leadership is no longer confined to managerial roles. Every nurse may exemplify nursing leadership by motivating and guiding the patients and their families, the healthcare team, and the whole organization.
At present, there remains a paucity of research examining the relationship between the leadership competencies of frontline nurses and their service recipients. International studies primarily concentrate on identifying the essential competencies required for effective nursing leadership, as well as delineating various leadership styles [32, 33]. It is a prevalent issue to conflate nursing leadership with nursing management, the nursing leadership was narrowly defined as the exclusive domain of nursing managers. This study also focuses on the relationship between nursing leadership and patient satisfaction. Unlike previous satisfaction surveys that employed percentage ratings, this study used the NHC-ISSE satisfaction survey issued by the National Health Commission, which evaluated nursing satisfaction from five dimensions through a Likert 4-point score. Furthermore, the focus shifted from the entire ward to individual nurses. Each nurse received an NHC-ISSE satisfaction survey from two to four patients. The average score was used as the satisfaction score for each nurse and then matched with the corresponding NLQ score one by one.
This study concentrated on general clinical nurses and categorized nursing leadership into seven dimensions according to the NLQ questionnaire developed by Hangzhou Normal University: interpersonal skill, communication skill, critical thinking ability, problem-solving ability, planning and organizing ability, nursing expertise, and self-protection ability—each emphasizing the nurses’ skills and competencies. This survey demonstrated an upper level of nursing leadership among the enrolled frontline nurses, similar to an investigation in China [34]. Among all average dimension scores of the NLQ scale, the critical thinking ability dimension scored the highest, and the nursing expertise dimension scored the next. This phenomenon may be attributed to the increasing number of nurses, elevated educational standards, and fine-sorted specialization in recent years. In comparison, the self-protection ability scored lower, suggesting the need for clinical nurses to enhance their self-protection training to handle potential disputes or conflicts with patients.
Our survey findings indicated a level of overall inpatient satisfaction with their responsible nurse, potentially attributable to the surveyed hospital’s status as a regional medical center and the nurses’ high standards of care and professional competence. Among all average dimension scores of inpatient satisfaction, patient satisfaction with caregiver management and discharge instruction was comparatively higher, reflecting a strong humanistic management concept of frontline nurses. Conversely, patient satisfaction with nursing-patient communication and pain management was comparatively lower, indicating that the surveyed nurses should enhance their expertise and competencies in these two domains. With the increasing patient needs for nursing services, effective nurse-patient communication serves as a cornerstone for establishing a good relationship [35]. In addition, the lack of effective integration between specialized knowledge and clinical practice in pain management among clinical nurses may lead to adverse effects on patients, triggering unnecessary physiological, psychological, and emotional responses [36]. Overall, patient satisfaction, an essential element of high-quality medical care, has garnered significant attention from healthcare providers, researchers, and policymakers [37]. In numerous countries, it has been institutionalized as a critical metric for assessing medical quality in hospitals [38, 39], and in the United States, it also serves as a vital reference for medical insurance and subsidies [40]. Relevant studies have shown that patient satisfaction is related to medical quality and efficiency, such as improving treatment compliance, reducing readmission rates and mortality rates, and shortening hospital stays [41]. Therefore, besides cultivating professional knowledge and skills, nurses should also pay attention to the cultivation of nursing leadership competencies.
Notably, this survey found minimal sociodemographic differences in NLQ scores of nurses and NHC-ISSE scores of patients, contrary to traditional expectations. In general, the leadership skills of frontline nurses are likely to develop progressively over time, particularly through engagement in roles such as preceptor, mentor, or charge nurse, which provide valuable experiential learning opportunities. Thus, nurses with higher education, senior titles, and more experience are generally expected to show stronger leadership abilities. The current results may stem from convenience sampling based on voluntary participation, likely overrepresenting nurses with leadership awareness. Future studies should use mandatory surveys covering all frontline nurses to improve representativeness and generalizability. Meanwhile, patients with higher education levels tend to have greater health awareness, while those with higher incomes may expect more from healthcare services, potentially leading to lower satisfaction. Therefore, the lack of sociodemographic differences in satisfaction scores requires further investigation, as current findings may be influenced by care provided by frontline nurses with leadership awareness, sampled via convenience sampling.
Up to now, the relationship between nurse leadership and patient satisfaction is rarely reported and remains controversial [24, 42]. This study revealed a positive correlation between NLQ and NHC-ISSE scales, along with their various dimensions, to differing extents. This finding implied that increasing nursing leadership of clinical nurses was associated with enhanced patient satisfaction. Furthermore, multivariate partial correlation analysis revealed the important role played by communication skills, problem-solving abilities, and nursing expertise of clinical nurses in influencing patient satisfaction. Effective nurse-patient communication constitutes a core factor of nursing practice, serving as a facilitator for fostering good relationships [43]. Through proactive communication and interaction, nurses can accurately evaluate patient needs, while patients can develop self-care competencies and adhere to treatment regimens. This mutual interaction can cultivate trust, thereby enhancing overall patient satisfaction [44]. Additionally, given the complexity and variability of patient conditions, nurses must possess strong adaptability [45]. A robust problem-solving ability is another core factor of nursing practice, facilitating the timely and effective resolution of medical and health problems, thereby enhancing the patient experience and satisfaction. Furthermore, nursing expertise serves as the essential foundation for effective care; it encompasses the requisite knowledge and skills, critical thinking abilities, and other personal attributes necessary for nurses to fulfill their responsibilities effectively [46]. The nursing expertise provides a direct impact on patient health and safety, which constitutes the most essential requirement and standard for ensuring patient satisfaction.

Limitations

(1) The convenience sampling method employed in this study inherently introduces bias into the findings. (2) The conclusions only derive from this single-center study with a small sample and require larger-scale studies and multi-center expansions to verify comprehensively and adequately. (3) The cross-sectional design limits the ability to establish causal relationships between nursing leadership and patient satisfaction; future research should employ regression analyses or longitudinal study designs to more rigorously examine these associations. (4) Certain confounding variables, such as patients’ clinical conditions and nurses’ emotional states, may have influenced the observed correlations. Future studies should consider controlling for such factors.

Conclusion

Nursing leadership ought to be an essential competency for every professional nurse. The survey findings indicate that nursing leadership and patient satisfaction within the hospital are positioned at a moderate-high level, yet there remains potential for enhancement. This survey has identified the communication skills, problem-solving abilities, and nursing expertise of clinical nurses as the primary factors influencing patient satisfaction. So, it is recommended to launch quality improvement initiatives to monitor the impact of nurse leadership on patient outcomes, with focused attention on the aforementioned leadership skills that significantly influence satisfaction levels. Additionally, future studies should consider conducting large-scale, multi-center investigations with enhanced control for potential confounding factors, as well as the application of regression analyses or longitudinal study designs. Definitizing the important impact of nursing leadership and the essential competencies on patient satisfaction can facilitate the training strategy adjustment of nursing competencies, potentially leading to improvements in nursing safety and quality.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Declarations

This study was conducted under the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013) and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (Approval No.: S20230345-01, Date: Aug. 21, 2023). All participants signed informed consent.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Download
Titel
Effect of nurse leadership on national survey and evaluation of inpatient satisfaction: a single-center correlation study
Verfasst von
Mengqin Dai
Yun Qiu
Shuai Xie
Xiaoyu Li
Xiaojing Xue
Yangjie Wang
Xiaoyan Zhao
Miyan Wang
Mei He
Yuwei Yang
Publikationsdatum
11.02.2026
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nursing / Ausgabe 1/2026
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-04418-0
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mendes C, Carvalho M, Oliveira L, Rodrigues LM, Gregório J. Nurse-led intervention for the management of bariatric surgery patients: A systematic review. Obes Rev. 2023;24(11):e13614. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13614.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Edvardsson D, Watt E, Pearce F. Patient experiences of caring and person-centredness are associated with perceived nursing care quality. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(1):217–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13105. Epub 2016 Sep 23. PMID: 27532230.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chenoweth L, Williams A, McGuire J, Reyes P, Maiden G, Brodaty H, Liu Z, Cook J, McCade D, Taylor-Rubin C, Freeman M, Burley C. Evaluating implementation and outcomes of a Person-Centered care model for people with dementia in the rehabilitation In-Patient setting: project protocol. J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;91(4):1409–21. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-220882.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gao C, Xu J, Liu Y, Yang Y. Nutrition policy and healthy China 2030 Building. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021;75(2):238–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-020-00765-6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwei RJ, Hoang L, Wilson P, Greene MZ, Lor M, Shah MN, Pulia MS. Patient-centered care outcomes for patients in the emergency department with a non-English Language preference: A scoping review. Patient Educ Couns. 2023;114:107875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2023.107875.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Disch J. Nursing leadership in policy formation. Nurs Forum. 2020;55(1):4–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12375.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson-Brantley HV, Ford DJ. Leading change: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(4):834–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13223.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Juma PA, Edwards N, Spitzer D. Kenyan nurses involvement in National policy development processes. Nurs Res Pract. 2014;2014:236573. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/236573.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Benton D, Shaffer F. How the nursing profession can contribute to sustainable development goals. Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2016;23(7):29–34. https://doi.org/10.7748/nm.2016.e1534. PMID: 27800732.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Christopher-Dwyer K, Scanlon KG, Crimlisk JT. Critical care resource nurse team: a patient safety and quality outcomes model. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Jan-Feb 01;41(1):46–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000501.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonetti L, Tolotti A, Anderson G, Nania T, Vignaduzzo C, Sari D, Barello S. Nursing interventions to promote patient engagement in cancer care: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022;133:104289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104289.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nurmeksela A, Mikkonen S, Kinnunen J, Kvist T. Relationships between nurse managers’ work activities, nurses’ job satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and medication errors at the unit level: a correlational study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):296. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06288-5. PMID: 33794875; PMCID: PMC8017674.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Elsheikh R, Le Quang L, Nguyen NQT, Van PT, Hung DT, Makram AM, Huy NT. The role of nursing leadership in promoting evidence-based nursing practice. J Prof Nurs. 2023 Sep-Oct;48:93–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.06.007.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gottlieb LN, Gottlieb B, Bitzas V. Creating empowering conditions for nurses with workplace autonomy and agency: how healthcare leaders could be guided by Strengths-Based nursing and healthcare leadership (SBNH-L). J Healthc Leadersh. 2021;13:169–81. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S221141.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Halcomb EJ, Davidson PM, Patterson E. Promoting leadership and management in Australian general practice nursing: what will it take? J Nurs Manag. 2008;16(7):846–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00938.x.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cable S, Graham E. Leading better care: an evaluation of an accelerated coaching intervention for clinical nursing leadership development. J Nurs Manag. 2018;26(5):605–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12590.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Peltzer JN, Ford DJ, Shen Q, Fischgrund A, Teel CS, Pierce J, Jamison M, Waldon T. Exploring leadership roles, goals, and barriers among Kansas registered nurses: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Nurs Outlook. 2015 Mar-Apr;63(2):117–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2015.01.003.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gifford W, Davies B, Tourangeau A, Lefebre N. Developing team leadership to facilitate guideline utilization: planning and evaluating a 3-month intervention strategy. J Nurs Manag. 2011;19(1):121–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01140.x.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hult M, Terkamo-Moisio A, Kaakinen P, Karki S, Nurmeksela A, Palonen M, Peltonen LM, Häggman-Laitila A. Relationships between nursing leadership and organizational, staff and patient outcomes: A systematic review of reviews. Nurs Open. 2023;10(9):5920–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1876.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hefnawy GR, Alshammari MSS, Alrumayh AGR, Alruwaili AO, Jones LK. Impact of nurse leaders behaviors on nursing staff performance: a systematic review of literature. Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231178528. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580231178528.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulugeta H, Wagnew F, Dessie G, Biresaw H, Habtewold TD. Patient satisfaction with nursing care in ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nurs. 2019;18:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0348-9. PMID: 31320836; PMCID: PMC6615179.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gavurova B, Dvorsky J, Popesko B. Patient satisfaction determinants of inpatient healthcare. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(21):11337. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111337. PMID: 34769856; PMCID: PMC8582779.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat McCay R, Lyles AA, Larkey L. Nurse leadership style, nurse satisfaction, and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. J Nurs Care Qual. 2018 Oct/Dec;33(4):361–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000317.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Stikes R, Arterberry K, Logsdon MC. A nurse leadership project to improve health literacy on a maternal-infant unit. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct;44(5):665–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/1552-6909.12742.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Jia JF. Research on nurse leadership and its influencing factors: taking tertiary general hospitals in certain district as an example, M.A. Thesis. Zhejiang: Hangzhou Normal University, 2013.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Reilly D, Brady AM, Bryant-Lukosius D, Varley J, Daly L, Cotter P, Elliot N, Lehane E, Fleming S, Savage E, Hegarty J, Drennan J. Patient-reported experiences of consultation with an advanced nurse practitioner: factor structure and reliability analysis of the patient enablement and satisfaction survey. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77(10):4279–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15026. Epub 2021 Aug 27. PMID: 34449917.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Reising VA. What is a nurse? Am J Nurs. 2019;119(6):11. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000559784.09183.4d. PMID: 31135407.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan L, Klein T. Nurse practitioner hospitalists: an empowered role. Nurs Outlook. 2021 Sep-Oct;69(5):856–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 May 4. PMID: 33958202.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen Z, Lam W, Zhong JA. Leader-member exchange and member performance: a new look at individual-level negative feedback-seeking behavior and team-level empowerment climate. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(1):202–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.202.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Sinko L, Montgomery T, Terhaar M, Schroeder K. Situating nursing science and public health within a shared context. Public Health Nurs. 2022;39(5):1065–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13093.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiwanuka F, Nanyonga RC, Sak-Dankosky N, Muwanguzi PA, Kvist T. Nursing leadership styles and their impact on intensive care unit quality measures: an integrative review. J Nurs Manag. 2021;29(2):133–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13151. Epub 2020 Sep 21. PMID: 32881169.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson CS, Smith CM. Preparing nursing professional development practitioners in their pivotal leadership role. J Nurses Prof Dev. 2017 Nov/Dec;33(6):316–317. https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000392. PMID: 29095218.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu X, Zhang Y, Zhou P, Zhou X. Developing a leadership and management competency framework for nurse champion: A qualitative study from Shanghai, China. J Nurs Manag. 2022;30(4):962–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13580. Epub 2022 Mar 20. PMID: 35258146.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, Liu Y, Yu M, Wang H, Peng C, Zhang P, Nian X, Jia Q, Li C. Disaster preparedness among nurses in china: A Cross-Sectional study. J Nurs Res. 2023;31(1):e255. https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000537.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Saleh AM. Nurses’ perceptions of Prognosis-Related communication. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022;23(3):775–80. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.3.775. PMID: 35345346; PMCID: PMC9360952.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Bushey MA, Kroenke K, Weiner J, Porter B, Evans E, Baye F, Lourens S, Weitlauf S. Telecare management of pain and mood symptoms: Adherence, utility, and patient satisfaction. J Telemed Telecare. 2020;26(10):619–26. Epub 2019 Jun 20. PMID: 31221047.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang H, Xue Y, Zhang ZR. Patient satisfaction in china: a National survey of inpatients and outpatients. BMJ Open. 2021;11(9):e049570. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049570. PMID: 34493518; PMCID: PMC8424834.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Manary MP, Boulding W, Staelin R, Glickman SW. The patient experience and health outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(3):201–3. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1211775. Epub 2012 Dec 26. PMID: 23268647.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Fenton JJ, Jerant AF, Bertakis KD, Franks P. The cost of satisfaction: a National study of patient satisfaction, health care utilization, expenditures, and mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(5):405–11. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1662. Epub 2012 Feb 13. PMID: 22331982.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyu H, Wick EC, Housman M, Freischlag JA, Makary MA. Patient satisfaction as a possible indicator of quality surgical care. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(4):362-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/2013.jamasurg.270. PMID: 23715968.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai TC, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Patient satisfaction and quality of surgical care in US hospitals. Ann Surg. 2015;261(1):2–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000765. PMID: 24887985; PMCID: PMC4248016.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Zurück zum Zitat McCay R, Lyles AA, Larkey L. Nurse leadership style, nurse satisfaction, and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. J Nurs Care Qual. 2018 Oct/Dec;33(4):361–367. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000317. PMID: 29266044.
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Höglander J, Holmström IK, Lövenmark A, Van Dulmen S, Eide H, Sundler AJ. Registered nurse-patient communication research: an integrative review for future directions in nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 2023;79(2):539–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15548. Epub 2022 Dec 19. PMID: 36534429.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Niederhauser V, Wolf J. Patient experience: a call to action for nurse leadership. Nurs Adm Q. 2018 Jul/Sep;42(3):211–216. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000293. PMID: 29870486.
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Li YM, Luo YF. The influencing factors of clinical nurses’ problem solving dilemma: a qualitative study. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2022;17(1):2122138. PMID: 36120892; PMCID: PMC9518267.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Mrayyan MT, Abunab HY, Abu Khait A, Rababa MJ, Al-Rawashdeh S, Algunmeeyn A, Abu Saraya A. Competency in nursing practice: a concept analysis. BMJ Open. 2023;13(6):e067352. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067352. PMID: 37263688; PMCID: PMC10255110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral